Sign in
NeurosciencePLoS ONE
Peer-reviewed journal article

THINGS: A database of 1,854 object concepts and more than 26,000 naturalistic object images

Martin N. HebartiD, Adam H. Dickter, Alexis KidderiD, Wan Y. KwokiD, Anna CorriveauiD, Caitlin Van Wicklin, Chris Ian BakeriD

Abstract

In recent years, the use of a large number of object concepts and naturalistic object images has been growing enormously in cognitive neuroscience research. Classical databases of object concepts are based mostly on a manually-curated set of concepts. Further, databases of naturalistic object images typically consist of single images of objects cropped from their background, or a large number of uncontrolled naturalistic images of varying quality, requiring elaborate manual image curation. Here we provide a set of 1,854 diverse object concepts sampled systematically from concrete picturable and nameable nouns in the American English language. Using these object concepts, we conducted a large-scale web image search to compile a database of 26,107 high-quality naturalistic images of those objects, with 12 or more object images per concept and all images cropped to square size. Using crowdsourcing, we provide higher-level category membership for the 27 most common categories and validate them by relating them to representations in a semantic embedding derived from large text corpora. Finally, by feeding images through a deep convolutional neural network, we demonstrate that they exhibit high selectivity for different object concepts, while at the same time preserving variability of different object images within each concept. Together, the THINGS database provides a rich resource of object concepts and object images and offers a tool for both systematic and large-scale naturalistic research in the fields of psychology, neuroscience, and computer science.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
282
FWCI
16.75
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHarrison '22Grootswager '22Hebart '23King '19Valério '23Lindh '19
78% semantic matchNeuroscience
William John Harrison·Perception·Mar 16, 2022· 26 citations