Molecular complex detection in protein interaction networks through reinforcement learning
Meghana Venkata PalukuriiD, Ridhi S. PatiliD, Edward M. MarcotteiD
Abstract
Many, if not most, proteins assemble into higher-order complexes to perform their biological functions. Such protein-protein interactions (PPI) are often experimentally measured for pairs of proteins and summarized in a weighted PPI network, to which community detection algorithms can be applied to define the various higher-order protein complexes. Current methods, which include both unsupervised and supervised approaches, often assume that protein complexes manifest only as dense subgraphs, and in the case of supervised approaches, focus only on learning which subgraphs correspond to complexes, not how to find them in a network, a task that is currently solved using heuristics. However, learning to walk trajectories on a network with the goal of finding protein complexes lends itself naturally to a reinforcement learning (RL) approach, a strategy that has not been extensively explored for community detection. Here, we evaluated the use of a reinforcement learning pipeline for community detection in weighted protein-protein interaction networks to detect new protein complexes. Using known complexes, the algorithm is trained to calculate the value of different possible subgraph densities in the process of walking on the network to find a protein complex. Then, a distributed prediction algorithm scales the RL pipeline to search for protein complexes on large PPI networks. The reinforcement learning pipeline applied to a human PPI network consisting of 8k proteins and 60k PPI results in 1,157 protein complexes and shows competitive accuracy with improved speed when compared to previous algorithms. We highlight protein complexes harboring minimally characterized proteins including C4orf19, C18orf21, and KIAA1522, suggest TMC04 to be a putative additional subunit of the KICSTOR complex, and confirm the participation of C15orf41 in a higher-order complex with CDAN1, ASF1A, and HIRA by 3D structural modeling. Reinforcement learning offers several distinct advantages for community detection, including scalability and knowledge of the walk trajectories defining those communities.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Super.Complex: A supervised machine learning pipeline for molecular complex detection in protein-interaction networks
Meghana Venkata Palukuri, Edward M. Marcotte·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2021
- Identifying Protein Complexes in Protein-protein Interaction Data using Graph Convolution Network
Nazar Zaki, Harsh Singh, Elfadil Abdalla Mohamed·IEEE AccessPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021
- Protein complex prediction for large protein protein interaction networks with the Core&Peel Method
Marco Pellegrini, Miriam Baglioni, Filippo Geraci·bioRxiv·May 17, 2016
- A partially shared joint clustering framework for detecting protein complexes from multiple state-specific signed interaction networks
Youlin Zhan, Jiahan Liu, … Le Ou-Yang·Computers in Biology and MedicinePeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2023
- AFM-RL: Large Protein Complex Docking Using AlphaFold-Multimer and Reinforcement Learning
Tunde W. Aderinwale, Rashidedin Jahandideh, … Daisuke Kihara·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2024
- Disease associated protein-protein interaction network reconstruction based on comprehensive influence analysis
Fei Zhu, Feifei Li, … Bairong Shen·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2019