bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
A calibrated novelty flag for fungal ITS metabarcoding: choosing the error rate at which sequences are declared new
Abstract
O_LIEnvironmental fungal surveys routinely recover internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences that cannot be assigned at fine taxonomic ranks, the so-called fungal "dark matter." Such sequences are set aside by thresholding a similarity or confidence score at a conventional value. Those conventions do abstain, but the error rate a threshold implies is neither stated nor selectable, and a threshold defined for one kind of score does not transfer to another. C_LIO_LIWe present a conformal novelty flag that supplies what is missing: each query receives a p-value with a distribution-free guarantee that the rate of falsely declaring a known sequence novel is bounded by a user-chosen . We evaluate it on a leave-one-genus-out benchmark built from UNITE, on alignment identity, a k-mer bootstrap consensus and two neural classifiers output probabilities, and on a soil fungal dataset. C_LIO_LIThe flag holds its nominal rate across two orders of magnitude in , so an operating point can be chosen rather than inherited: at = 0.05 it fires on 4.3% of known-genus queries and recovers 19.2% of genuinely novel genera. The cutoff holding a 5% error rate here is 64.8% identity, nowhere near the customary 97%, showing how little a threshold carries its error rate between datasets. Coverage transferred across eleven settings spanning those four scores, two amplicon regions and a sevenfold change in reference size, all within 1.1 percentage points of nominal, while detection ranged from 5.2% to 53.3%: the guarantee is on the error rate and not on power, and two of our settings are valid but uninformative. Applied to soil data the flag identifies 20.7% of amplicon sequence variants as novel at a controlled 5% error rate, 16.3% under an abundance filter. Half of those recur near-identically among GlobalFungis unnamed environmental variants while fewer than one in ten matches a named species hypothesis, a sixfold skew towards the uncatalogued against 1.9-fold for sequences the flag passes. C_LIO_LIThe flag turns an arbitrary cutoff into a decision with a stated error rate, and in doing so converts dark matter from a residue into a set of prioritizable targets for formal description. C_LI
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- ClassifyITS: An R Package for assigning taxonomy to fungal ITS sequences using taxon-specific cutoff values
Quinn Moon, Leho Tedersoo, … Timothy Yong James·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2026
- Combining the 5.8S and ITS2 gene regions to improve classification of fungi
F. Heeger, C. Wurzbacher, … M. T. Monaghan·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2019
- A learned fungal ITS embedding does not outperform correctly configured alignment in open-world evaluation
Aaron O’Brien, Auguste Gardette·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2026
- HiTaC: a hierarchical taxonomic classifier for fungal ITS sequences compatible with QIIME2
Fábio Malcher Miranda, Vasco Azevedo, … Vitor C. Piro·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2024
- Classical baselines outperform released deep-learning ITS classifiers, which collapse on ITS2 where predictions follow the flanking regions
Aaron O’Brien, Auguste Gardette, … Pilar Parada·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2026
- EMITS: expectation-maximization abundance estimation for fungal ITS communities from long-read sequencing
Aaron O’Brien, Catalina Lagos, … Pilar Parada·bioRxiv·May 25, 2026