Stimulus expectations do not modulate visual event-related potentials in probabilistic cueing designs
Carla den OudeniD, Andong ZhouiD, Vinay Mepani, Gyula KovácsiD, Rufin VogelsiD, Daniel FeuerriegeliD
Abstract
Humans and other animals can learn and exploit repeating patterns that occur within their environments. These learned patterns can be used to form expectations about future sensory events. Several influential predictive coding models have been proposed to explain how learned expectations influence the activity of stimulus-selective neurons in the visual system. These models specify reductions in neural response measures when expectations are fulfilled (termed expectation suppression) and increases following surprising sensory events. However, there is currently scant evidence for expectation suppression in the visual system when confounding factors are taken into account. Effects of surprise have been observed in blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signals, but not when using electrophysiological measures. To provide a strong test for expectation suppression and surprise effects we performed a predictive cueing experiment while recording electroencephalographic (EEG) data. Participants (n=48) learned cue-face associations during a training session and were then exposed to these cue-face pairs in a subsequent experiment. Using univariate analyses of face-evoked event-related potentials (ERPs) we did not observe any differences across expected (90% probability), neutral (50%) and surprising (10%) face conditions. Across these comparisons, Bayes factors consistently favoured the null hypothesis throughout the time-course of the stimulus-evoked response. When using multivariate pattern analysis we did not observe above-chance classification of expected and surprising face-evoked ERPs. By contrast, we found robust within- and across-trial stimulus repetition effects. Our findings do not support predictive coding-based accounts that specify reduced prediction error signalling when perceptual expectations are fulfilled. They instead highlight the utility of other types of predictive processing models that describe expectation-related phenomena in the visual system without recourse to prediction error signalling. Highlights- We performed a probabilistic cueing experiment while recording EEG. - We tested for effects of fulfilled expectations, surprise, and image repetition. - No expectation-related effects were observed. - Robust within- and across-trial repetition effects were found. - We did not find support for predictive coding models of expectation effects.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 30
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Limited evidence for probabilistic cueing effects on grating-evoked event-related potentials and orientation decoding performance
Carla den Ouden, Máire Kashyap, … Daniel Feuerriegel·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- Prediction Error and Repetition Suppression Have Distinct Effects on Neural Representations of Visual Information
Matthew F. Tang, Cooper Smout, … Jason B. Mattingley·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2018
- Multimodal evidence challenges the effectiveness of probabilistic cueing for establishing sensory expectations
Ziyue Hu, Dominic M. D. Tran, Reuben Rideaux·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Perceptual Expectations Do Not Modulate Image Repetition Effects As Measured By Event-Related Potentials
Daniel Feuerriegel, Owen F. Churches, … Hannah A. D. Keage·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2017
- Temporal expectations modulate face image repetition suppression as indexed by event-related potentials
Daniel Feuerriegel, Owen F. Churches, … Hannah A. D. Keage·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2018
- Measures of repetition suppression in the Fusiform Face Area are inflated by co-occurring effects of statistically learned visual associations
Sophie‐Marie Rostalski, Catarina Amado, … Daniel Feuerriegel·CortexPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2020