Briefings in BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A systematic evaluation of data processing and problem formulation of CRISPR off-target site prediction
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9 system is widely used in a broad range of gene-editing applications. While this gene-editing technique is quite accurate in the target region, there may be many unplanned off-target edited sites. Consequently, a plethora of computational methods have been developed to predict off-target cleavage sites given a guide RNA and a reference genome. However, these methods are based on small-scale datasets (only tens to hundreds of off-target sites) produced by experimental techniques to detect off-target sites with a low signal-to-noise ratio. Recently, CHANGE-seq, a new in vitro experimental technique to detect off-target sites, was used to produce a dataset of unprecedented scale and quality (more than 200,000 off-target sites over 110 guide RNAs). In addition, the same study included GUIDE-seq experiments for 58 of the guide RNAs to produce in vivo measurements of off-target sites. Here, we fill the gap in previous computational methods by utilizing these data to perform a systematic evaluation of data processing and formulation of the CRISPR off-target site prediction problem. Our evaluations show that data transformation as a pre-processing phase is critical prior to model training. Moreover, we demonstrate the improvement gained by adding potential inactive off-target sites to the training datasets. Furthermore, our results point to the importance of adding the number of mismatches between the guide RNA and the off-target site as a feature. Finally, we present predictive off-target in vivo models based on transfer learning from in vitro. Our conclusions will be instrumental to any future development of an off-target predictor based on high-throughput datasets.
- Citations
- 19
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Field percentile
- top 21%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Generating, modeling, and evaluating a large-scale set of CRISPR/Cas9 off-target sites with bulges
Ofir Yaish, Yaron Orenstein·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 30, 2024
- Classifying CRISPR-Cas9 Off-Target Cleavage Sites from GUIDE-seq Data: A Class-Imbalanced Machine Learning Benchmark
Deeksha Sarvi, Juhitha Alasyam·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2026
- Predicting off-target effects for end-to-end CRISPR guide design
Jennifer Listgarten, Michael M. Weinstein, … Nicolò Fusi·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2016
- CROP: A CRISPR/Cas9 guide selection program based on mapping guide variants
Victor Aprilyanto, Redi Aditama, … Tony Liwang·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 15, 2021
- piCRISPR: Physically Informed Deep Learning Models for CRISPR/Cas9 Off-Target Cleavage Prediction
Florian Störtz, Jeffrey Kelvin Mak, Péter Mináry·Artificial Intelligence in the Life SciencesPeer-reviewed·May 15, 2023
- Decoupled Representation Learning Improves Generalization in CRISPR Off-Target Prediction
Nyla Bhargava, Aditya Goswami·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2026