Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
The Influence of Brain MRI Defacing Algorithms on Brain-Age Predictions via 3D Convolutional Neural Networks
Ryan J. CaliiD, Ravi R. BhattiD, Sophia I. ThomopoulosiD, Shruti P. GadewariD, Iyad Ba GariiD, Tamoghna ChattopadhyayiD, Neda JahanshadiD, Paul M. ThompsoniD, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Abstract
In brain imaging research, it is becoming standard practice to remove the face from the individuals 3D structural MRI scan to ensure data privacy standards are met. Face removal - or defacing - is being advocated for large, multi-site studies where data is transferred across geographically diverse sites. Several methods have been developed to limit the loss of important brain data by accurately and precisely removing non-brain facial tissue. At the same time, deep learning methods such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are increasingly being used in medical imaging research for diagnostic classification and prognosis in neurological diseases. These neural networks train predictive models based on patterns in large numbers of images. Because of this, defacing scans could remove informative data. Here, we evaluated 4 popular defacing methods to identify the effects of defacing on brain age prediction - a common benchmarking task of predicting a subjects chronological age from their 3D T1-weighted brain MRI. We compared brain-age calculations using defaced MRIs to those that were directly brain extracted, and those with both brain and face. Significant differences were present when comparing average per-subject error rates between algorithms in both the defaced brain data and the extracted facial tissue. Results also indicated brain age accuracy depends on defacing and the choice of algorithm. In a secondary analysis, we also examined how well comparable CNNs could predict chronological age from the facial region only (the extracted portion of the defaced image), as well as visualize areas of importance in facial tissue for predictive tasks using CNNs. We obtained better performance in age prediction when using the extracted face portion alone than images of the brain, suggesting the need for caution when defacing methods are used in medical image analysis.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Brain age prediction of healthy subjects on anatomic MRI with deep learning: going beyond with an \"explainable AI\" mindset
Paul Hérent, Simon Jégou, … Thomas Clozel·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2018
- Learning Patterns of the Ageing Brain in MRI using Deep Convolutional Networks
Nicola K. Dinsdale, Emma Bluemke, … Ana I. L. Namburete·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2020
- From a deep learning model back to the brain - inferring morphological markers and their relation to aging
Gidon Levakov, Gideon Rosenthal, … Galia Avidan·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2019
- Accurate brain age prediction using recurrent slice-based networks
Pradeep Lam, Vigneshwaran Santhalingam, … Paul M. Thompson·International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (SIPAIM)Peer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2020
- Optimising a Simple Fully Convolutional Network (SFCN) for accurate brain age prediction in the PAC 2019 challenge
Weikang Gong, Christian F. Beckmann, … Han Peng·Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·May 10, 2021
- Predicting Brain Age Using Structural Neuroimaging and Deep Learning
Y. Varatharajah, S. Baradwaj, … K. Kohlhoff·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2018