Evaluating the estimability of within-host population dynamics models

Despite the impacts of within-host disease dynamics on disease outcomes in individual hosts and disease spread among-hosts, generic models of within-host population dynamics have received far less attention than their among-host counterparts. While a number of models have been proposed to explore theoretical eco-evolutionary dynamics, they have yet to be evaluated for estimability, raising questions about their ability to provide reliable inference when confronted with data. We evaluated the estimability of two generic within-host population dynamics models by assessing: (1) parameter estimation, our ability to recover correct values of model parameters from data, (2) the consequences of mis-assigning the underlying mechanistic model on parameter estimation, and (3) the reproduction of qualitative dynamics, or, our ability to use parameter estimates to reproduce observed dynamical behaviours. In some cases, fitting a mis-matched mechanistic model to time series data produced reasonable parameter estimates that were able to reproduce system dynamics, and that when provided the data-generating model, parameter uncertainty can produce substantial behavioural uncertainty. Our findings highlight the impacts of structural, parametric, and behavioural uncertainty on inference, and demonstrate the value of improving system-specific knowledge to prevent the use of incorrect functional forms and of measuring consequential parameters to improve estimability.