henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint

A Synthesis of the Many Errors and Learning Processes of Visuomotor Adaptation

J. Ryan MoreheadiD, Jean‐Jacques Orban de XivryiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Visuomotor adaptation has one of the oldest experimental histories in psychology and neuroscience, yet its precise nature has always been a topic of debate. Here we offer a survey and synthesis of recent work on visuomotor adaptation that we hope will prove illuminating for this ongoing dialogue. We discuss three types of error signals that drive learning in adaptation tasks: task performance error, sensory prediction-error, and a binary target hitting error. Each of these errors has been shown to drive distinct learning processes. Namely, both target hitting errors and putative sensory prediction-errors drive an implicit change in visuomotor maps, while task performance error drives learning of explicit strategy use and non-motor decision-making. Each of these learning processes contributes to the overall learning that takes place in visuomotor adaptation tasks, and although the learning processes and error signals are independent, they interact in a complex manner. We outline many task contexts where the operation of these processes is counter-intuitive and offer general guidelines for their control, measurement and interpretation. We believe this new framework unifies several disparate threads of research in sensorimotor adaptation that often seem in conflict. We conclude by explaining how this more nuanced understanding of errors and learning processes could lend itself to the analysis of other types of sensorimotor adaptation, of motor skill learning, of the neural processing underlying sensorimotor adaptation in humans, of animal models and of brain computer interfaces.

Abstract summary

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 2 Nov 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Synthesizing visuomotor adaptation literature, this review maps three distinct error signals—task performance, sensory prediction, and binary target hitting errors—onto interacting implicit and explicit learning processes.

Despite a long experimental history in psychology and neuroscience, the nature of visuomotor adaptation remains debated and research threads often appear in conflict. Synthesizing how task performance, sensory prediction, and binary target hitting errors drive independent yet interacting implicit and explicit learning processes provides a unified framework and experimental guidelines.

Key results

  1. ClaimedBinary target hitting errors and putative sensory prediction-errors drive implicit updates to visuomotor maps, whereas task performance errors drive explicit strategy use and non-motor decision-making.

    Synthesized from recent experimental literature on visuomotor adaptation tasks. · Abstract

  2. ClaimedAlthough the three error signals and their associated implicit and explicit learning processes are independent, they interact across task contexts in ways that can produce counter-intuitive behavior.

    Survey and conceptual synthesis of visuomotor adaptation paradigms, accompanied by guidelines for experimental control, measurement, and interpretation. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

Conducted a literature survey and conceptual synthesis of recent visuomotor adaptation research, categorizing error signals, their downstream implicit and explicit learning processes, and guidelines for experimental design and interpretation.

Reproducibility gaps
Review and synthesis paper (abstract only); no primary datasets or software are reported in the abstract.
Limitations (1)
  • This work is a conceptual survey and synthesis of existing literature rather than a report of new primary experimental data. · noted in this summary

Read this if you design or interpret visuomotor and sensorimotor adaptation experiments, motor skill learning paradigms, or brain-computer interface studies.

Citations
51

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLeow '18Lee '18Shingane '25Tsay '20Nabaee-Tabr '25Hutter '21
82% semantic matchNeuroscience
Li‐Ann Leow, Welber Marinovic, Aymar de Rugy+1 more·European Journal of Neuroscience·Oct 19, 2018· 76 citations