PLoS Computational BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline
Vishaka DattaiD, Sridhar S. HannenhalliiD, Rahul SiddharthaniD
Abstract
ChIP-seq (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing) is a high-throughput technique to identify genomic regions that are bound in vivo by a particular protein, e.g., a transcription factor (TF). Biological factors, such as chromatin state, indirect and cooperative binding, as well as experimental factors, such as antibody quality, cross-linking, and PCR biases, are known to affect the outcome of ChIP-seq experiments. However, the relative impact of these factors on inferences made from ChIP-seq data is not entirely clear. Here, via a detailed ChIP-seq simulation pipeline, ChIPulate, we assess the impact of various biological and experimental sources of variation on several outcomes of a ChIP-seq experiment, viz., the recoverability of the TF binding motif, accuracy of TF-DNA binding detection, the sensitivity of inferred TF-DNA binding strength, and number of replicates needed to confidently infer binding strength. We find that the TF motif can be recovered despite poor and non-uniform extraction and PCR amplification efficiencies. The recovery of the motif is however affected to a larger extent by the fraction of sites that are either cooperatively or indirectly bound. Importantly, our simulations reveal that the number of ChIP-seq replicates needed to accurately measure in vivo occupancy at high-affinity sites is larger than the recommended community standards. Our results establish statistical limits on the accuracy of inferences of protein-DNA binding from ChIP-seq and suggest that increasing the mean extraction efficiency, rather than amplification efficiency, would better improve sensitivity. The source code and instructions for running ChIPulate can be found at https://github.com/vishakad/chipulate.
- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Field percentile
- top 27%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- ChIP-R: Assembling reproducible sets of ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq peaks from multiple replicates
Rhys Newell, Richard Pienaar, … Mikael Bodén A·GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2021
- A flexible simulation toolkit for designing and evaluating ChIP-sequencing experiments
An Zheng, Michael Lamkin, … Melissa Gymrek·bioRxiv·May 1, 2019
- To mock or not: a comprehensive comparison of mock IP and DNA input for ChIP-seq
Jinrui Xu, Michelle M. Kudron, … Mark Gerstein·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2020
- Systematic Regional Bias is Widespread in ChIP-seq
Oliver Hughes, Gabriel Foley, … Mikael Bodén A·bioRxiv·May 13, 2026
- Crunch: Integrated processing and modeling of ChIP-seq data in terms of regulatory motifs
Severin Berger, Saeed Omidi, … Erik van Nimwegen·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2019
- Accounting for GC-content bias reduces systematic errors and batch effects in ChIP-Seq data
Mingxiang Teng, Rafael A. Irizarry·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2017