Nature NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Accurate angular integration with only a handful of neurons
Marcella NoormaniD, Brad K. HulseiD, Vivek JayaramaniD, Sandro RomaniiD, Ann M. HermundstadiD
Abstract
To flexibly navigate, many animals rely on internal spatial representations that persist when the animal is standing still in darkness, and update accurately by integrating the animals movements in the absence of localizing sensory cues. Theories of mammalian head direction cells have proposed that these dynamics can be realized in a special class of networks that maintain a localized bump of activity via structured recurrent connectivity, and that shift this bump of activity via angular velocity input. Although there are many different variants of these so-called ring attractor networks, they all rely on large numbers of neurons to generate representations that persist in the absence of input and accurately integrate angular velocity input. Surprisingly, in the fly, Drosophila melanogaster, a head direction representation is maintained by a much smaller number of neurons whose dynamics and connectivity resemble those of a ring attractor network. These findings challenge our understanding of ring attractors and their putative implementation in neural circuits. Here, we analyzed failures of angular velocity integration that emerge in small attractor networks with only a few computational units. Motivated by the peak performance of the fly head direction system in darkness, we mathematically derived conditions under which small networks, even with as few as 4 neurons, achieve the performance of much larger networks. The resulting description reveals that by appropriately tuning the network connectivity, the network can maintain persistent representations over the continuum of head directions, and it can accurately integrate angular velocity inputs. We then analytically determined how performance degrades as the connectivity deviates from this optimally-tuned setting, and we find a trade-off between network size and the tuning precision needed to achieve persistence and accurate integration. This work shows how even small networks can accurately track an animals movements to guide navigation, and it informs our understanding of the functional capabilities of discrete systems more broadly.
- Citations
- 34
- FWCI
- 7.99
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- From the fly connectome to exact ring attractor dynamics
Tirthabir Biswas A, Angel Stanoev, … James E. Fitzgerald·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2024
- Learning accurate path integration in a ring attractor model of the head direction system
Pantelis Vafidis, David Owald, … Richard Kempter·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2022
- Hidden symmetries in network connectivity support ring attractor dynamics in the fly's neural compass
Brad K. Hulse, P.B. Aneesh, … Ann M. Hermundstad·bioRxiv·May 20, 2026
- The neuroanatomical ultrastructure and function of a biological ring attractor
Daniel B. Turner‐Evans, Kristopher Torp Jensen, … Vivek Jayaraman·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Sep 10, 2020
- The head direction circuit of two insect species
Ioannis Pisokas, Stanley Heinze, Barbara H. Webb·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2020
- Dynamic control of cortical head-direction signal by angular velocity
Arseny Finkelstein, Hervé Rouault, … Nachum Ulanovsky·bioRxiv·Aug 8, 2019