ArrayNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Does Human-Like Contextual Object Recognition Emerge from Language Supervision and Language-Guided Inference?
Karim RajaeiiD, Radoslaw Martin CichyiD, Hamid Soltanian-zadeh AiD
Abstract
Human vision is an active, context-sensitive process that interprets objects in relation to their surroundings. While behavioral research has long shown that scene context facilitates object recognition, the underlying computational mechanisms--and the extent to which artificial vision models replicate this ability--remain unclear. Here, we addressed this gap by combining human behavioral experiments with computational modeling to investigate how structured scene context influences object recognition. Using a novel 3D simulation framework, we embedded target objects into indoor scenes, and manipulated contextual coherence between objects and scenes by using either intact scenes or their phase-scrambled versions. Humans showed a robust object recognition advantage in coherent scenes, particularly under challenging conditions such as occlusion, crowding, or non-canonical viewpoints. Conventional vision models--including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs)--failed to replicate this effect. In contrast, vision-language models (VLMs), particularly those using ViT architectures and trained with language supervision (e.g., CLIP), approached human-like accuracy. This shows that semantically rich and category-structured representations are required for modelling context sensitivity. Notably, context sensitive behavior was closest to humans in VLMs when using language-guided inference at test time. This suggests that how a model accesses its representations during inference is relevant for enabling context-sensitive behavior. Together, this work offers steps towards a computational account of contextual facilitation of objects by scenes, and highlights zero-shot inference as an interesting alignment metric when benchmarking artificial and biological vision.
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Human-like meaning maps from single-prompt VLM ratings of local scene meaning
Katarzyna Jurewicz, Yohaï-Eliel Berreby, B. Suresh Krishna·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2026
- Contextual associations represented both in neural networks and human behavior
Elissa Aminoff, Shira Baror, … Daniel Leeds·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 2, 2022
- The Impact of Scene Context on Visual Object Recognition: Comparing Humans, Monkeys, and Computational Models
Sara Djambazovska, Anaa Zafer, … Kohitij Kar·Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience (CCN)Peer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Shared representations of human actions across vision and language
Diana C. Dima, Sugitha Janarthanan, … Yalda Mohsenzadeh·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2024
- Monkey See, Model Knew: Large Language Models Accurately Predict Visual Brain Responses in Humans AND Non-Human Primates
Colin Conwell, Emalie McMahon, … Leyla Işık·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2025
- Video-Language Models as Flexible Social and Physical Reasoners
Daniel Fleury·bioRxiv·May 11, 2024