Biological PsychologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Using N2pc variability to probe functionality: Linear mixed modelling of trial EEG and behaviour
Clayton HickeyiD, Damiano GrignolioiD, Vinura Munasinghe, David J. AcunzoiD
Abstract
This paper has two concurrent goals. On one hand, we hope it will serve as a simple primer in the use of linear mixed modelling (LMM) for inferential statistical analysis of multimodal data. We describe how LMM can be easily adopted for the identification of trial-wise relationships between disparate measures and provide a brief cookbook for assessing the suitability of LMM in your analyses. On the other hand, this paper is an empirical report, probing how trial-wise variance in the N2pc, and specifically its sub-component the NT, can be predicted by manual reaction time (RT) and stimuli parameters. Extant work has identified a link between N2pc and RT that has been interpreted as evidence of a direct and causative relationship. However, results have left open the less-interesting possibility that the measures covary as a function of motivation or arousal. Using LMM, we demonstrate that the relationship only emerges when the NT is elicited by targets, not distractors, suggesting a discrete and functional relationship. In other analyses, we find that the target-elicited NT is sensitive to variance in distractor identity even when the distractor cannot itself elicit consistently lateralized brain activity. The NT thus appears closely linked to attentional target processing, supporting the propagation of target-related information to response preparation and execution. At the same time, we find that this component is sensitive to distractor interference, which leaves open the possibility that NT reflects brain activity responsible for the suppression of irrelevant distractor information.
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- No overlap in neurophysiological predictors of moment-to-moment fluctuations of behavioural variability and subjective attentional state
Marlou Nadine Perquin, Marcus Daghlian, … Aline Bompas·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2026
- Predicting the irrelevant: Neural effects of distractor predictability depend on load
Troby Ka‐Yan Lui, Jonas Obleser, Malte Wöstmann·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Emotion regulation or dual task? Dissociation of neural and behavioral measures
Nicola Sambuco, Francesco Versace, … Jennifer A. Minnix·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2026
- Attention and prediction modulations in expected and unexpected visuospatial trajectories.
Kristen S. Baker, Alan John Pegna, … Patrick Johnston·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2021
- Neural signatures of flexible temporal orienting under spatial and motor uncertainty
Yi Gao, Irene Echeverria-Altuna, … Anna Christina Nobre·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Working memory availability affects neural indices of distractor processing during visual search
Dion Henare, Jude Buckley, Paul Michael Corballis·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2018