Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Evaluation of 3D markerless motion capture accuracy using OpenPose with multiple video cameras
Nobuyasu NakanoiD, 哲郎 櫻, Kazuhiro UedaiD, Leon Omura, Arata KimuraiD, Yoichi IinoiD, Senshi FukashiroiD, Shinsuke YoshiokaiD
Abstract
There is a need within human movement sciences for a markerless motion capture system, which is easy to use and suffciently accurate to evaluate motor performance. This study aims to develop a 3D markerless motion capture technique, using OpenPose with multiple synchronized video cameras, and examine its accuracy in comparison with optical marker-based motion capture. Participants performed three motor tasks (walking, countermovement jumping, and ball throwing), with these movements measured using both marker-based optical motion capture and OpenPose-based markerless motion capture. The differences in corresponding joint positions, estimated from the two different methods throughout the analysis, were presented as a mean absolute error (MAE). The results demonstrated that, qualitatively, 3D pose estimation using markerless motion capture could correctly reproduce the movements of participants. Quantitatively, of all the mean absolute errors calculated, approximately 47% were less than 20 mm and 80% were less than 30 mm. However, 10% were greater than 40 mm. The primary reason for mean absolute errors exceeding 40mm was that OpenPose failed to track the participants pose in 2D images owing to failures, such as recognition of an object as a human body segment, or replacing one segment with another depending on the image of each frame. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that, if an algorithm that corrects all apparently wrong tracking can be incorporated into the system, OpenPose-based markerless motion capture can be used for human movement science with an accuracy of 30mm or less.
- Citations
- 383
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements
K. Song, T. J. Hullfish, … J. R. Baxter·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2023
- Validation of marker-less pose estimation for 3D kinematics during upper limb reaching
I. Avni, L. Landau, … L. Shmuelof·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2023
- Performance Evaluation of Markerless 3D Skeleton Pose Estimates with Pop Dance Motion Sequence
Rollyn T. Labuguen, Wally Enrico M. Ingco, … Tomohiro Shibata·International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV)Peer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2020
- Validation of two-dimensional video-based inference of finger kinematics with pose estimation
L. Gionfrida, W. Rusli, … A. E. Kedgley·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2022
- Human Movement Science in The Wild: Can Current Deep-Learning Based Pose Estimation Free Us from The Lab?
L. Needham, M. Evans, … S. L. Colyer·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2021
- Examination of 2D frontal and sagittal markerless motion capture: Implications for 2D and 3D markerless applications
L. Wade, L. Needham, … J. Bilzon·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2023