Large-scale estimation of bacterial and archaeal DNA prevalence in metagenomes reveals biome-specific patterns
Abstract
Metagenomes often contain many reads derived from eukaryotes. However, there is usually no reliable method for estimating the prevalence of non-microbial reads in a metagenome, forcing many analysis techniques to make the often-faulty assumption that all reads are microbial. For instance, the success of metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) recovery efforts is assessed by the number of reads mapped to recovered MAGs, a procedure which will underestimate the true fidelity if eukaryotic reads are present. Here we present "SingleM microbial_fraction" (SMF), a scalable algorithm that robustly estimates the number of bacterial and archaeal reads in a metagenome, and the average microbial genome size. SMF does not use eukaryotic reference genome data and can be applied to any Illumina metagenome. Based on SMF, we propose the "Domain-Adjusted Mapping Rate" (DAMR) as an improved metric to assess microbial genome recovery from metagenomes. We benchmark SMF on simulated and real data, and demonstrate how DAMRs can guide genome recovery. Applying SMF to 136,284 publicly available metagenomes, we report substantial variation in microbial fractions and biome-specific patterns of microbial abundance, providing insights into how microorganisms and eukaryotes are distributed across Earth. Finally, we show that substantial amounts of human host DNA sequence data have been deposited in public metagenome repositories, possibly counter to ethical directives that mandate screening of these reads prior to release. As the adoption of metagenomic sequencing continues to grow, we foresee SMF being a valuable tool for the appraisal of genome recovery efforts, and the recovery of global patterns of microorganism distribution.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 16.42
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- SingleM and Sandpiper: Robust microbial taxonomic profiles from metagenomic data
B. J. Woodcroft, S. T. N. Aroney, … G. W. Tyson·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2024
- Recovery of 447 Eukaryotic bins reveals major challenges for Eukaryote genome reconstruction from metagenomes.
J. Saraiva, Alexander Bartholomäus, … Ulisses Nunes da Rocha·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2022
- Quantifying microbial DNA in metagenomes improves microbial trait estimation
Raphael Eisenhofer, Antton Alberdi, Ben J. Woodcroft·ISME CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Shotgun metagenomics of soil invertebrate communities reflects taxonomy, biomass and reference genome properties
Alexandra Schmidt, Clément Schneider, … Miklós Bálint·Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- Genome-reconstruction for eukaryotes from complex natural microbial communities
Patrick T. West, Alexander J. Probst, … Jillian F. Banfield·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2018
- MuDoGeR: Multi-Domain Genome Recovery from metagenomes made easy
Ulisses Nunes da Rocha, Jonas Coelho Kasmanas, … Peter Florian Stadler·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2022