bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
338 coleopteran genomes reveal exceptional rearrangement variation compared to other insect orders
Arif MaulanaiD, Aleksandra BlizninaiD, Sam EbdoniD, Jessica A. ThomasiD, Julia GriesiD, Karin NäsvalliD, Duane D. McKennaiD, Ksenia KrasheninnikovaiD, Camilla A. SantosiD, Karen BrooksiD, Dominic E. AbsoloniD, Danil ZiloviD, Kamil S. JaroňiD, Joana I. MeieriD
Abstract
Chromosomal rearrangements reshape genome architecture, but rate variation across the tree of life remains poorly understood. Analysing 338 beetle (Coleoptera) genomes, we inferred eight ancestral linkage groups. No species retained these linkage groups, whereas the most frequent karyotypes of 10 or 11 chromosomes evolved at least 65 times through independent rearrangements. Rearrangement rates vary widely across lineages, with exceptionally high rates associated with major species radiations. Comparisons to 340 fly and 210 butterfly and moth genomes reveal the highest rates of long-term persistent rearrangements in beetles and that the beetle X chromosome traces back to the ancestor of Holometabola. We identified frequent X chromosome changes, mostly representing recent autosomal-X fusions, but no fissions. For autosomes, key rearrangement predictors include chromosome size, repeats and centromere position.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- assay: long-read sequencing
- research focus: phylogenetics / evolution
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: statistical model
- approach: simulation
- approach: comparative / phylogenetic analysis
In-depth summary
Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 8 Nov 2026 · from the full text of version 1 (22 Jul 2026) · CC BY 4.0
From 338 beetle genomes, eight ancestral linkage groups were inferred; rearrangement rates vary widely, peaking in major radiations, and the X chromosome dates to Holometabola's ancestor.
Rearrangement-rate variation and its genomic predictors remain poorly resolved: cytogenetic counts cannot establish homology of rearranged chromosomes, and a prior 210-genome Lepidoptera study found no correlates of lineage-specific rate variation. Chromosome-scale assemblies across a species-rich order let the authors reconstruct beetle ancestral linkage groups, test genomic predictors and links to diversification, and contrast beetles with flies and moths.
Key results
ShownBeetles descend from eight ancestral linkage groups (C1 to C7 plus the sex-linked CX). Early fissions on the Adephaga and Polyphaga stems mean that no extant genome in the dataset keeps the ancestral configuration.
3,603 of 3,729 BUSCO genes (approximately 97%) were assigned to C1–C7 and CX, with co-assignment blocks recovered across 10,000 Syngraph bootstrap replicates. A stem-Polyphaga fission of C1 gives nine ALGs, still retained in 15 species. Nine fissions on the Adephaga stem produced 17 linkage groups. · Eight ancestral linkage groups reveal deep…; Ancient fissions and divergent rearrangement…; Inferring ancestral linkage groups
ShownThe common 10- and 11-chromosome karyotypes are convergent endpoints that arose at least 65 times, mostly via fissions of a few large ALGs. Models favour optima near n = 10–11; n = 10 arises more often than expected and persists once reached, but transitions show no universal pull toward it.
n = 10 arose at least 36 times (101 species), 17 of them by one fission of the polyphagan configuration (C2 in 15); n = 11 arose 29 times. Moves toward vs away from n = 10: 91 vs 134 (p = 0.998). Origins: 31 vs a simulated median of 19 [11–29], p = 0.0136. Exit rate 19.0% vs 43.0%, Fisher p = 3.0 × 10^-10. · Ancient fissions and divergent rearrangement…; Phylogenetic tests of chromosome-number…
SuggestedRearrangement tempo differs greatly among beetle lineages. Clades with larger increases in rearrangement rate tend to show larger increases in diversification rate. Beetles also keep more persistent rearrangements than flies or moths.
33% of species show at most three rearrangements, while at least 21 lineages (41% of species) exceed ten. Clade rate ratios span 0.08–18.17-fold, with seven strongly accelerated clades including Phytophaga and Chrysomelidae. Log rearrangement-rate ratio vs log diversification-rate ratio: PGLS β = 0.0373, t = 2.56, p = 0.0145. · Highly variable tempo of chromosome evolution…; Chromosomal rearrangement bursts coincide with…; Contrasting modes of genome structure evolution…; Testing association of rearrangement rates and…
ShownChromosome size, satellite repeats and centromere position predict autosomal rearrangement. Small chromosomes tend to fuse and large ones to split, and recent fissions yield acrocentric chromosomes, consistent with Robertsonian mechanisms.
Versus non-rearranged chromosomes, fusing ones were 2.26× smaller and splitting ones 1.65× larger; splitting ones were 3.73× the size of fusion partners (mixed model F = 2947, p < 2.2 × 10^-16). Satellite enrichment near breakpoints (100-kb windows): 2.30-fold for fusions, 2.69-fold for fissions, p < 0.01. Centromere position (157 genomes): 0.126 after recent fission vs 0.326–0.420. · Chromosome size and centromere architecture…; Analysing potential constraints in chromosomal…; Analysing potential constraints in chromosomal…; Analysing potential constraints in chromosomal…
ShownThe ancestral beetle X (CX) is highly conserved. Its changes are mostly recent X-autosome fusions concentrated on terminal branches, and CX fuses less often than its size predicts. Partial homology with the fly sex-linked ALG D6 supports a holometabolan ancestral X.
Of 147 species with identified sex chromosomes, 116 retain CX as the X and 31 carry 25 independent neo-X cases. There is one true turnover (Aleochara curtula). CX fusion odds ratio 0.23 [0.15–0.36], p = 3.97 × 10^-13. Only eight of 55 X-related transitions are shared by two or more species. · Sex chromosome changes in Coleoptera; Deep conservation of the ancestral holometabolan…; Identifying changes and constraints of sex…
Methods, data and reproducibility
BUSCO single-copy orthologues from 354 chromosome-level assemblies supported an IQ-TREE phylogeny and parsimony-based Syngraph inference of ancestral linkage groups and fissions/fusions. Rearrangement predictors were then tested with AGORA gene order, phylogenetic comparative models, repeat and centromere annotation, and cross-order ALG mapping.
- Public chromosome-level beetle assemblies downloaded from NCBI (through 7 February 2026), 231 generated by the Darwin Tree of Life Project · Coleoptera (beetles; multiple species) · n = 338 species (two of 340 excluded)
- Outgroup genomes spanning Strepsiptera, Neuroptera, Megaloptera and Raphidioptera for ancestral reconstruction · Neuropteroid insects (multiple species) · n = 16 species
- Beetle assemblies from sequenced males, with X/Y assigned using genome metadata, karyotype records and PacBio HiFi or RNA-seq read coverage · Coleoptera (multiple species) · n = 147 of 338 species
- Beetle genomes with putative centromeres predicted by the Centromere Analysis Pipeline · Coleoptera (multiple species) · n = 157 genomes
- Published Diptera phylogeny and ancestral linkage groups (D1 to D6) · Diptera (flies) · n = 340 genomes
- Published Lepidoptera phylogeny and Merian elements (M1 to M31, MZ) · Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) · n = 210 genomes
- Clade-level diversification-rate estimates taken from McKenna et al. (2019) · Coleoptera
- Tribolium castaneum Tcas5.2 assembly used to approximate Stevens element gene membership · Tribolium castaneum
- Methods & tools
- BUSCO v.6.0.0 (metaeuk mode, coleoptera_odb12), Syngraph (parsimony ALG inference; -m 10 -r 2), IQ-TREE v.3.0.1 with ModelFinder (Q.insect+I+G4), MAFFT v.7.525; trimAl v.1.4.1, AGORA (ancestral gene order reconstruction), EDTA v.2.2.2; BISER v.1.4, Helixer v.0.3.5, Centromere Analysis Pipeline (CAP v.1.0) with TRASH2, pbmm2 v.1.13.1; HISAT2 v.2.2.1; mosdepth v.0.3.3, OrthoFinder v.3.0.1.b1, bayou and geiger (BM/OU/EB models); phytools, R: caper, nlme, ape, glmmTMB, brms, emmeans
- Code
- https://github.com/Obscuromics/coleoptera-ALGshttps://github.com/lstevens17/busco2fastahttps://github.com/nylander/catfasta2phymlhttps://github.com/vlothec/TRASH_2https://github.com/oushujun/EDTA
- Data & accessions
- https://github.com/Obscuromics/coleoptera-ALGs
- Software & environment
- NCBI Datasets v.16.13.0; BUSCO v.6.0.0; MAFFT v.7.525; trimAl v.1.4.1; IQ-TREE v.3.0.1; EDTA v.2.2.2; BISER v.1.4; Helixer v.0.3.5; CAP v.1.0; pbmm2 v.1.13.1; HISAT2 v.2.2.1; mosdepth v.0.3.3; BEDTools v.2.31.1; OrthoFinder v.3.0.1.b1; R versions unstated
- Reproducibility gaps
- Assembly details and references are given only in supplementary Table S1. Event calls depend on manual genome curation and corrections described in Supplementary Texts 1 and 2. Compute resources and R package versions are not reported.
Limitations (6)
- Syngraph output depended on the minimum-marker threshold (-m). Some Chrysomeloidea nodes yielded implausibly merged linkage groups, which required a separate -m 24 run plus manual event corrections for species with unlocalised scaffolds. · stated by the authors
- Many assemblies came from female specimens, so their X chromosomes could not be confidently identified. For the CX fissions in Blaps rhynchoptera, Euwallacea and Sphaeroderma testaceum, it is unknown whether the derived chromosomes act in sex determination. · stated by the authors
- The link between rearrangement and diversification rates is correlational. The authors note that rearrangements alone need not drive phytophagan diversification and leave causal inference to follow-up studies. · stated by the authors
- AGORA placed genes into highly fragmented contiguous ancestral regions (156 CARs). It was therefore used only as an approximate reference for gene-order fragmentation, not to define the exact ancestral gene order within ALGs. · stated by the authors
- Event tallies depend on definitions. The abstract states there are no X fissions, yet three CX fission transitions are reported (in female-derived assemblies). Origins of n = 10 number at least 36 in one analysis but 31 in the simulation test. · noted in this summary
- Centromeres were called in 157 genomes by manually inspecting CAP scores and satellite, TE, GC and gene-density signals, without cytological or chromatin-based validation. The Robertsonian interpretation therefore rests on predicted positions. · noted in this summary
Read this if you study karyotype or sex chromosome evolution in insects and want a phylogeny-wide map of beetle fissions and fusions, with tests of size, repeat and centromere predictors.
- Citations
- 12
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Species-rich and genomically diverse: comparative genomics reveals how fusions, fissions, and sex chromosomes have shaped beetle evolution
Dwayne G. Tally, Charlie Pittman, Ryan Bracewell·bioRxiv·May 18, 2026
- Sex chromosome evolution in beetles
R. Bracewell, A. Tran, … D. Bachtrog·bioRxiv·Jan 18, 2023
- Evolutionary dynamics of sex chromosomes and candidate sex-determining genes across the beetle phylogeny
Yuan Fu, W T Sun, Bengt Hansson·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2026
- Chromosome-scale genome assemblies of aphids reveal extensively rearranged autosomes and long-term conservation of the X chromosome
Thomas C. Mathers, Roland H. M. Wouters, … Saskia A. Hogenhout·Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2020
- Determinants of chromosomal rearrangements in holocentric Leptidea butterflies
Filip Thörn, Jean‐Loup Claret, … Jesper Boman·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2026
- High-density linkage maps and chromosome level genome assemblies unveil direction and frequency of extensive structural rearrangements in wood white butterflies (Leptidea spp.)
L. Höök, K. Näsvall, … N. Backström·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2022