Scientific ReportsMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Evaluating metabarcoding to analyse diet composition of species foraging in anthropogenic landscapes using Ion Torrent and Illumina sequencing
Marie-Amélie Forin-WiartiD, Marie‐Lazarine PoulleiD, Sylvain PiryiD, Jean‐François CossoniD, Claire LaroseiD, Maxime GalaniD
Abstract
DNA metabarcoding of faecal samples is being successfully used to study the foraging niche of species. We assessed the ability of two benchtop high-throughput sequencing (HTS) platforms, to identify a large taxonomic array of food items from domestic cats Felis silvestris catus, including prey and human-related food taxa (pet food and leftovers leaving undetectable solid remains in faeces). Scats from a captive feeding trial (n=41) and from free-ranging individuals (n=326) were collected and analysed using a cytb mini-barcode in independent PCR duplicates on the Ion PGM and the MiSeq platforms. Outputs from MiSeq were more sensitive and reproducible than those from Ion PGM due to a higher sequencing depth and sequence quality on MiSeq. DNA from intact prey taxa was detected more often (82% of the expected occurrences) than DNA from pet food (54%) and raw fish and meat (31%). We assumed that this variability was linked to different degree of DNA degradation: The Ion PGM detected significantly less human-linked food, birds, field voles, murids and shrews in the field-collected samples than the MiSeq platform. Pooling the replicates from both platforms and filtering the data allowed identification of at least one food item in 87.4% of the field-collected samples. Our DNA metabarcoding approach identified 29 prey taxa, of which 25 to species level (90% of items) including 9 rodents, 3 insectivores, 12 birds and 1 reptile and 33 human-related food taxa of which 23 were identified to genus level (75% of items). Our results demonstrate that using HTS platforms such as MiSeq, which provide reads of sufficiently high quantity and quality, with sufficient numbers of technical replicates, is a robust and non-invasive approach for further dietary studies on animals foraging on a wide range of food items in anthropogenic landscapes.
- Citations
- 47
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Field percentile
- top 5%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Metaproteomics and DNA metabarcoding as tools to assess dietary intake in humans
Brianna L. Petrone, Alexandria Bartlett, … Manuel Kleiner·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2024
- DNA metabarcoding successfully quantifies relative abundances of arthropod taxa in songbird diets: a validation study using camera-recorded diets
Y. I. Verkuil, M. Nicolaus, … C. Both·Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2022
- Comparison of mechanical sorting and DNA metabarcoding for diet analysis with degraded wolf scats
A. L. Massey, G. Roffler, … T. Levi·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2019
- eDNA metabarcoding vs metagenomics: an assessment of dietary competition in two estuarine pipefishes
C. P. Serite, A. Emami-Khoyi, … P. Teske·bioRxiv·Jan 5, 2021
- Increasing marine trophic web knowledge through DNA analyses of fish stomach contents: a step towards an Ecosystem Based Approach to fisheries research
O. Canals, A. Lanzen, … N. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2023
- Tiger diet in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve: how do metabarcoding and mechanical sorting compare?
Sarang Mishrikotkar, Nidhi Yadav, … Mousumi Ghosh‐Harihar·Journal of ZoologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2025