NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Capturing the nature of events and event context using Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED)
Kay A. RobbinsiD, Dung TruongiD, Stefan AppelhoffiD, Arnaud Delorme AiD, Scott MakeigiD
Abstract
Event-related data analysis plays a central role in EEG and MEG (MEEG) and other neuroimaging modalities such as fMRI. Choices about which events to report and how to annotate their full natures significantly influence the value, reliability, and reproducibility of neuroimaging datasets for further analysis and meta- or mega-analysis. A powerful annotation strategy using the new third-generation formulation of the Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED) framework and tools (hedtags.org) combines robust event description with details of experiment design and metadata in a human-readable as well as machine-actionable form, making event annotation relevant to the full range of neuroimaging and other time series data. This paper considers the event design and annotation process using as a case study the well-known multi-subject, multimodal dataset of Wakeman and Henson made available by its authors as a Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) dataset (bids.neuroimaging.io). We propose a set of best practices and guidelines for event annotation integrated in a natural way into the BIDS metadata file architecture, examine the impact of event design decisions, and provide a working example of organizing events in MEEG and other neuroimaging data. We demonstrate how annotations using HED can document events occurring during neuroimaging experiments as well as their interrelationships, providing machine-actionable annotation enabling automated within- and across-experiment analysis and comparisons. We discuss the evolution of HED software tools and have made an accompanying HED-annotated BIDS-formatted edition of the MEEG data of the Wakeman and Henson dataset (openneuro.org, ds003645).
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Automated EEG mega-analysis II: Cognitive aspects of event related features
Nima Bigdely-Shamlo, Jonathan Touryan, … Kay A. Robbins·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2019
- MEG-BIDS: an extension to the Brain Imaging Data Structure for magnetoencephalography
Guiomar Niso, Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski, … Sylvain Baillet·Scientific DataPeer-reviewed·Jun 19, 2018
- HBN-EEG: The FAIR implementation of the Healthy Brain Network (HBN) electroencephalography dataset
Seyed Yahya Shirazi, Alexandre R. Franco, … Scott Makeig·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2024
- MEG/EEG group study with MNE: recommendations, quality assessments and best practices
Mainak Jas, Eric Larson, … Alexandre Gramfort·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2018
- Integrated analysis of anatomical and electrophysiological human intracranial data
Arjen Stolk, Sandon Griffin, … Robert Oostenveld·Nature ProtocolsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2018
- Heartbeat-evoked responses in M/EEG: A systematic review of methods with suggestions for analysis and reporting
Tim Paul Steinfath, Maria Azanova, … Arno Villringer·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2026