medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
What tools do men need to make an informed decision about germline genetic testing for prostate cancer? A qualitative and survey study
Kelsie RaspiniD, Larissa BartlettiD, Jennifer Kay MakiniD, Rebecca Wilson, Kate Butorac, Liesel M. FitzGeraldiD, Jessica K. RoydhouseiD, Joanne L. DickinsoniD
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
BACKGROUNDGermline genetic testing for prostate cancer (PrCa) can help identify those at greater risk of developing advanced or lethal disease, while also influencing treatment selection, however it is not widely embedded in PrCa care. An integral part of developing frameworks for the delivery of precision medicine is the inclusion of patients/consumers in the design to ensure their needs are met. METHODSPhase I: Focus group discussions with men diagnosed with PrCa (n=20), to determine their opinions, perceptions and expectations of germline genetic testing for PrCa. Data were analysed thematically. Phase II: Phase I themes informed a Precision Medicine in Prostate Cancer Information Toolkit, which was reviewed by patients (n=14), their carers/family members (n=4) and healthcare providers (n=14). RESULTSPhase I: Knowledge about precision medicine and genetic testing was generally low. The strongest motivation for undertaking testing for patients was to determine family members risk (n=7), and the biggest concern pertained to insurance discrimination (n=5). Phase II: Healthcare providers (n=8) generally found the purpose of the toolkit to be clearer than patients (n=5), who found it difficult to imagine its usefulness when considering their own genetic risk at/before diagnosis. Information regarding life insurance, implications for their family and costs associated with testing were of concern to all participant groups. CONCLUSIONSThis study revealed critical knowledge gaps, preferred communication/support needs, and concerns/risks associated with germline genetic testing for PrCa. Our toolkit, whilst valuable, requires further refinement to ensure broad accessibility across literary and cultural contexts.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic testing in cancer: a systematic review of patient reported measures
Kelsie Raspin, Daisy Nowakowski, … Jessica K. Roydhouse·medRxiv·Jul 7, 2025
- Pathogenic germline variants in a racially diverse real-world cohort of prostate cancer patients
Taylor B. Crawford, Maliha N Tayeb, … Kara N. Maxwell·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkPeer-reviewed·Jun 2, 2026
- Validation of a guidelines-based digital tool to assess the need for germline cancer genetic testing
Callan D. Russell, Ashley Daley, … Colleen A. Caleshu·Hereditary Cancer in Clinical PracticePeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2024
- Improved prostate cancer prediction by combining Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) test results with Genetic Risk Scores (GRS/PRS)
Jingzhan Lu, Ge Chen, … Harry Green·medRxiv·May 18, 2026
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial
Bethany Torr, Christopher Iain Jones, … Clare Turnbull·British Journal of CancerPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2024
- Defining the Critical Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: A Delphi Study
Kelly E. Ormond, Maia J. Borensztein, … Curtis R. Coughlin·Journal of Personalized MedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2021