Vision ResearchNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Cross-modal perceptual enhancement of unisensory targets is uni-directional and does not affect temporal expectations
Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated that redundant target stimuli can enhance performance due to multisensory interplay and interactively facilitate performance enhancements due to temporal expectations (TE; faster and accurate reactions to temporally expected targets). Here we tested whether other types of multisensory interactions - i.e. interactions evoked by temporally flanking irrelevant stimuli - can result in similar performance patterns and boost not only unisensory target perception (multi-vs. unisensory sequences) but also unisensory temporal expectations (expected vs. unexpected). To test our hypothesis, we presented sequences of 12 stimuli (10 Hz) which either consisted of auditory (A), visual (V) or alternating auditory-visual stimuli (e.g. A-V-A-V-...) with either auditory (AV(A)) or visual (AV(V)) targets. Participants had to discriminate target frequency which was unpredictable by temporal regularities (expected vs. unexpected target positions) and by stimulation sequence (A, V, AV(A), AV(V)). Moreover, we ran two experiments in which we presented redundant multisensory targets and manipulated the speed of the stimulation sequence (10 vs. 15 Hz stimulus trains) to control whether the results of Experiment 1 depended on sequence speed. Performance for unisensory targets was affected by temporally flanking distractors, with multisensory interactions selectively improving unisensory visual target perception. Yet, only redundant multisensory targets reliably affected TEs. Together, these results indicate that cross-modal facilitation of unisensory target perception in fast stimulus streams is uni-directional, but also differs from multisensory interactions evoked by redundant targets; more specifically, it appears to be context-dependent (task, design etc.) whether unisensory stimulation (unlike redundant target stimulation) allows for the generation of temporal expectations.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Field percentile
- top 15%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Task switching costs contribute to the apparent speeding of multisensory reaction times
Miriam Albat, Jasmin Hautmann, … Soner Ülkü·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2021
- Multisensory integration of stimulus-driven and goal-driven signals during urgent saccadic choices
Ashley Paro, Bashirul I Sheikh, … Emilio Salinas·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2026
- Behavioural and electrophysiological correlates of the cross-modal enhancement for unaware visual events
Márta Szabina Pápai, Mireia Torralba Cuello, Salvador Soto‐Faraco·bioRxiv·Dec 1, 2023
- Shaped by meaning, weighted by reliability: New insights into multisensory integration
Elizaveta Sycheva, Lea St-Gelais, … Vanessa Hadid·bioRxiv·Jan 5, 2026
- Perception - action dissociations depend on factors that affect multisensory processing
Nicola Bruno, Stefano Uccelli·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 4, 2024
- Training enhances the ability of listeners to exploit visual information for auditory scene analysis
Huriye Atilgan, Jennifer K. Bizley·CognitionPeer-reviewed·Dec 26, 2020