Enhancing metabarcoding efficiency and ecological insights through integrated taxonomy and DNA reference barcoding: a case study on beach meiofauna
Jan‐Niklas MacheriD, Alejandro MartíneziD, Sude Çakir, Pierre‐Etienne Cholley, Eleni ChristoforouiD, Marco Curini Galletti, Lotte van Galen, Marta García‐CoboiD, Ulf JondeliusiD, Daphne de Jong, Francesca LeasiiD, Michael Lemke, Iñigo Rubio‐LópeziD, Nuria SáncheziD, Martin Vinther SørenseniD, M. Antonio TodaroiD, Willem RenemaiD, Diego FontanetoiD
Abstract
Molecular techniques like metabarcoding, while promising for exploring diversity of communities, are often impeded by the lack of reference DNA sequences available for taxonomic annotation. Our study explores the benefits of combining targeted DNA barcoding and morphological taxonomy to improve metabarcoding efficiency, using beach meiofauna as a case study. Beaches are globally important ecosystems and are inhabited by meiofauna, microscopic animals living in the interstitial space between the sand grains, which play a key role in coastal biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics. However, research on meiofauna faces challenges due to limited taxonomic expertise and sparse sampling. We generated 775 new cytochrome c oxidase I DNA barcodes from meiofauna specimens collected along the Netherlands west coast and combined them with the NCBI GenBank database. We analysed alpha and beta diversity in 561 metabarcoding samples from 24 North Sea beaches, a region extensively studied for meiofauna, using both the enriched reference database and the NCBI database without the additional reference barcodes. Our results show a 2.5-fold increase in sequence annotation and a doubling of species-level Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) identification when annotating the metabarcoding data with the enhanced database. Additionally, our analyses revealed a bell-shaped curve of OTU richness across the intertidal zone, aligning more closely with morphological analysis patterns, and more defined community dissimilarity patterns between supralittoral and intertidal sites. Our research highlights the importance of expanding molecular reference databases and combining morphological taxonomy with molecular techniques for biodiversity assessments, ultimately improving our understanding of coastal ecosystems.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Meta-analysis shows both congruence and complementarity of DNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological community assessment
F. Keck, R. C. Blackman, … F. Altermatt·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2021
- DNA Metabarcoding For High-Throughput Monitoring Of Estuarine Macrobenthic Communities
Jorge Lobo, Shadi Shokralla, … Filipe O. Costa·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2017
- Comparison of DNA metabarcoding and morphological identification for stream macroinvertebrate biodiversity assessment and monitoring
J. M. Serrana, Y. Miyake, … K. Watanabe·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2018
- The spatial network structure of intertidal meiofaunal communities derived from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys in Northwest Iberia
B. Bellisario, M. Fais, … F. Costa·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2021
- Comparing DNA metabarcoding with morphology in the assessment of macrozoobenthos in Portuguese transitional waters in the scope of the Water Framework Directive monitoring
S. Duarte, P. E. Vieira, … F. O. Costa·bioRxiv·May 10, 2022
- Enhancing DNA metabarcoding performance and applicability with bait capture enrichment and DNA from conservative ethanol
Maïlys Gauthier, Lara Konecny‐Dupré, … Lefébure Tristan·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2019