NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Bootstrap aggregating improves the generalizability of Connectome Predictive Modelling
David A. O’ConnoriD, Evelyn M. R. LakeiD, Dustin ScheinostiD, Robert Todd ConstableiD
Abstract
It is a long-standing goal of neuroimaging to produce reliable generalized models of brain behavior relationships. More recently data driven predicative models have become popular. Overfitting is a common problem with statistical models, which impedes model generalization. Cross validation (CV) is often used to give more balanced estimates of performance. However, CV does not provide guidance on how best to apply the models generated out-of-sample. As a solution, this study proposes an ensemble learning method, in this case bootstrap aggregating, or bagging, encompassing both model parameter estimation and feature selection. Here we investigate the use of bagging when generating predictive models of fluid intelligence (fIQ) using functional connectivity (FC). We take advantage of two large openly available datasets, the Human Connectome Project (HCP), and the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC). We generate bagged and non-bagged models of fIQ in the HCP. Over various test-train splits, these models are evaluated in sample, on left out HCP data, and out-of-sample, on PNC data. We find that in sample, a non-bagged model performs best, however out-of-sample the bagged models perform best. We also find that feature selection can vary substantially within-sample. A more considered approach to feature selection, alongside data driven predictive modeling, is needed to improve cross sample performance of FC based brain behavior models.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Field percentile
- top 15%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Phenotype Prediction Using BEN-Based Predictive Modeling (BPM)
Donghui Song, Ze Wang·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2024
- Brain-phenotype predictions can survive across diverse real-world data
Brendan D. Adkinson, Matthew Rosenblatt, … Dustin Scheinost·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2024
- Machine learning prediction of cognition from functional connectivity: Are feature weights reliable?
Ye Tian, Andrew Zalesky·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2021
- Crossvalidation in brain imaging analysis
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2015
- Testing the Tests: Using Connectome-Based Predictive Models to Reveal the Systems Standardized Tests and Clinical Symptoms Are Reflecting
Anja Samardzija, Xilin Shen, … Robert Todd Constable·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 16, 2026
- Stacking models of brain dynamics improves prediction of subject traits in fMRI
Ben Griffin, Christine Ahrends, … Diego Vidaurre·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024