bioRxivEcology
Moving Past Neonicotinoids and Honeybees: A Systematic Review of Existing Research on Other Insecticides and Bees
T. Dirilgen, L. Herbertsson, A. D. O'Reilly, N. Mahon, D. A. Stanley
Abstract
Synthetic pesticides are used widely in agriculture to protect crops from pests, weeds and disease. However, their use also comes with a range of environmental concerns. One of which is effects of insecticides on non-target organisms such as bees, who provide pollination services for crops and wild plants. This systematic literature review quantifies the existing research on bees and insecticides broadly, and then focuses more specifically on non-neonicotinoid insecticides and non-honeybees. We find that articles on honeybees (Apis sp.) and insecticides account for 80% of all research, with all other bees combined making up 20%. Neonicotinoids were studied in 34% of articles across all bees and were the most widely studied insecticide class for non-honeybees overall, with almost three times as many studies than the second most studied class. Of non-neonicotinoid insecticide classes and non-honeybees; the most studied were pyrethroids and organophosphates followed by carbamates, and the most widely represented bee taxa were bumblebees (Bombus), followed by leaf-cutter bees (Megachile) and mason bees (Osmia). Research has taken place across several countries, with the highest numbers of articles from Brazil and the US, and with notable gaps from countries in Asia, Africa and Oceania. Mortality was the most studied effect type, while sub-lethal effects such as on behaviour were less studied. Few studies tested how insecticides were influenced by other multiple pressures, such as climate change and co-occurring pesticides (cocktail effects). As anthropogenic pressures do not occur in isolation, we suggest that future research also addresses these knowledge gaps. Given the changing global patterns in insecticide use, and the increasing inclusion of both non-honeybees and sub-lethal effects in pesticide risk assessment, there is a need for expanding research beyond current state to ensure a strong scientific evidence base for the development of risk assessment and associated policy.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Risk assessments underestimate threat of pesticides to wild bees
R. S. Shahmohamadloo, M. L. Tissier, L. M. Guzman·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2023
- Assessment of risk to hoary squash bees (Peponapis pruinosa) and other ground-nesting bees from systemic insecticides in agricultural soil
D. S. Willis Chan, R. S. Prosser, … N. E. Raine·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2019
- Acute Thiamethoxam toxicity in honeybees is not enhanced by common fungicide and herbicide and lacks stress-induced changes in mRNA splicing
P. Decio, P. Ustaoglu, … M. Soller·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2019
- Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide and a synthetic pyrethroid in full-sized honey bee colonies
R. Odemer, P. Rosenkranz·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2018
- First indication of acetylcholine-based communication in honeybee haemocytes and its modulation by a neonicotinoid insecticide
T. Pamminger, K. Basley, … WOH Hughes·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2017
- The Environmental Risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post-2013
T. J. Wood, D. Goulson·Environmental Science and Pollution ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2017