bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Inferring Multi-Stage Pathway Progression Models from Tumor Phylogenies
Abstract
Cancer progression is an evolutionary process driven by the accumulation and selection of somatic mutations, giving rise to genetically diverse subclonal populations within tumors. Understanding the dependencies among mutations and identifying recurrent evolutionary trajectories is critical for understanding cancer progression and informing therapeutic strategies. Recent advances in genomic sequencing and phylogenetic reconstruction now enable large-scale inference of tumor phylogenies, providing detailed representations of intratumor evolutionary histories across patient cohorts. However, modeling cancer progression from these data remains challenging due to extensive inter- and intratumor heterogeneity, often arising from mutations in different genes within the same pathway that confer similar fitness advantages. Existing methods to infer pathway-level progression models summarize each tumor by a single consensus genotype, ignoring intra-tumor heterogeneity, while phylogeny-based methods typically focus on individual mutations and do not model pathways. We introduce PhyloStage, an algorithm for inferring multi-stage pathway-level cancer progression models from large cohorts of tumor phylogenies. PhyloStage represents progression as a partial order over pathways, permitting independent mutations in incomparable pathways while constraining the order of mutations within the same or dependent pathways. The framework also incorporates uncertainty in tumor phylogenies, resolves mutation clusters with unknown ordering, and stratifies patients by progression stage. Applied to a cohort of 120 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tumor phylogenies, PhyloStage infers progression models that are aligned with known AML progression. On 99 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, PhyloStage stratifies patients into progression stages such that later stages have larger tumor sizes, corroborating phenotypic tumor progression.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: trajectory inference
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- C-ToMExO: Learning Cancer Progression Dynamics from Clonal Composition of Tumors
Mohammadreza Mohaghegh Neyshabouri, Smaragda Dimitrakopoulou, Jens Lagergren·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2022
- Comprehensive analysis of tumour initiation, spatial and temporal progression under multiple lines of treatment
Ignaty Leshchiner, Dimitri G. Livitz, … Gad A. Getz·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2019
- Improving personalized prediction of cancer prognoses with clonal evolution models
Y. Tao, A. Rajaraman, … R. Schwartz·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2019
- Computationally reconstructing the evolution of cancer progression risk
Kefan Cao, Russell S. Schwartz·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2025
- Tumor subclonal progression model for cancer hallmark acquisition
Yusuke Matsui, Satoru Miyano, Teppei Shimamura·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- Joint inference of exclusivity patterns and recurrent trajectories from tumor mutation trees
X. G. Luo, J. Kuipers, N. Beerenwinkel·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2021