PLoS Computational BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Systematic benchmarking of deep-learning methods for tertiary RNA structure prediction
Akash BahaiiD, Chee Keong KwohiD, Yuguang MuiD, Yinghui LiiD
Abstract
The 3D structure of RNA critically influences its functionality, and understanding this structure is vital for deciphering RNA biology. Experimental methods for determining RNA structures are labour-intensive, expensive, and time-consuming. Computational approaches have emerged as valuable tools, leveraging physics-based-principles and machine learning to predict RNA structures rapidly. Despite advancements, the accuracy of computational methods remains modest, especially when compared to protein structure prediction. Deep learning methods, while successful in protein structure prediction, have shown some promise for RNA structure prediction as well but face unique challenges. This study systematically benchmarks state-of-the-art deep learning methods for RNA structure prediction across diverse datasets. Our aim is to identify factors influencing performance variation, such as RNA family diversity, sequence length, RNA type, multiple sequence alignment (MSA) quality, and deep learning model architecture. We show that generally ML-based methods perform much better than non-ML methods on most RNA targets, although the performance difference isnt substantial when working with unseen novel or synthetic RNAs. The quality of the MSA and secondary structure prediction both play an important role and most methods arent able to predict non-Watson-Crick pairs in the RNAs. Overall, DeepFoldRNA has the best prediction followed by DRFold as the second best method. Finally, we also suggest possible mitigations to improve the quality of the prediction for future method development.
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Field percentile
- top 16%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Comparative Review of Deep Learning Methods for RNA Tertiary Structure Prediction
Ivona Martinović, Tin Vlašić, … Mile Šikić·bioRxiv·Nov 27, 2024
- Deep Learning for RNA Secondary Structure Determination: Gauging Generalizability and Broadening the Scope of Traditional Methods
Marcell Szikszai, Ting-Yuan Wang, … Sharon Aviran·RNAPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2026
- Limits of deep-learning-based RNA prediction methods
Marko Ludaic, Arne Elofsson·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2025
- Caveats to deep learning approaches to RNA secondary structure prediction
Christoph Flamm A, Julia Wielach, … Ivo L. Hofacker·Frontiers in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2022
- State-of-the-RNArt: benchmarking current methods for RNA 3D structure prediction
Clément Bernard, Guillaume Postic, … Fariza Tahi·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2024
- De Novo RNA Tertiary Structure Prediction at Atomic Resolution Using Geometric Potentials from Deep Learning
Robin Pearce, Gilbert S. Omenn, Yang Zhang·bioRxiv·May 15, 2022