Deep Learning for RNA Secondary Structure Determination: Gauging Generalizability and Broadening the Scope of Traditional Methods
Marcell SzikszaiiD, Ting-Yuan WangiD, Ryan KruegeriD, David H. MathewsiD, Max WardiD, Sharon AviraniD
Abstract
The diverse regulatory functions, protein production capacity, and stability of natural and synthetic RNAs are closely tied to their ability to fold into intricate structures. Determining RNA structure is thus fundamental to RNA biology and bioengineering. Among existing approaches to structure determination, computational secondary structure prediction offers a rapid and low-cost strategy and is thus widely used, especially when seeking to identify functional RNA elements in large transcriptomes or screen massive libraries of novel designs. While traditional approaches rely on detailed measurements of folding energetics and/or probabilistic modeling of structural data, recent years have witnessed a surge in deep learning methods, inspired by their tremendous success in protein structure prediction. However, the limited diversity and volume of known RNA structures can impede their ability to accurately predict structures markedly different from the ones they have seen. This is known as the generalization gap and currently poses a major barrier to progress in the field. In this Perspective article, we gauge method generalizability using a new benchmark dataset of structured RNAs we curated from the Protein Data Bank. We also discuss the emergence of deep learning methods for predicting structure probing data and use a new dataset to underscore generalization challenges unique to this domain along with directions for future improvement. Expanding beyond improving predictive accuracy, we review how advances in deep learning have recently enabled scalable and accessible optimization of traditional structure prediction methods and their seamless integration with modern neural networks.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Systematic benchmarking of deep-learning methods for tertiary RNA structure prediction
Akash Bahai, Chee Keong Kwoh, … Yinghui Li·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 30, 2024
- Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy
Heqin Zhu, Fenghe Tang, … S. Kevin Zhou·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Improving RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Through Expanded Training Data
Conner J. Langeberg, Taehan Kim, … Jamie H. D. Cate·RNAPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Limits of deep-learning-based RNA prediction methods
Marko Ludaic, Arne Elofsson·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2025
- Diverse Database and Machine Learning Model to narrow the generalization gap in RNA structure prediction
Albéric A. de Lajarte, Yves J. Martin des Taillades, … Silvi Rouskin·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2026
- UFold: Fast and Accurate RNA Secondary Structure Prediction with Deep Learning
Laiyi Fu, Yingxin Cao, … Xiaohui S. Xie·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2021