Science AdvancesMicrobiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Bacteria induce an amoeboid phase in coccolithophores that persists after bloom collapse
Sophie T ZweifeliD, Richard J. HenshawiD, Oliver MülleriD, Johannes M. KeegstraiD, Sam CharltoniD, Roberto PioliiD, Clara Martínez‐PéreziD, Uria AlcolombriiD, Estelle E. ClerciD, Roman StockeriD
Abstract
Coccolithophores, who contribute approximately 1-10% of phytoplankton biomass, are crucial players in the oceans biogeochemical cycles. Significant contributions come from bloom-forming species including Gephyrocapsa huxleyi (formerly Emiliania huxleyi), which has served as a model system for investigating algal-bacterial and agal-viral interactions as well as algal fitness responses to environmental changes. Coccolithophores follow a biphasic lifecycle, existing as motile haploid and non-motile diploid phases. Here we characterize a third, amoeboid phase, using a combination of light, electron and phase amplitude modulation (PAM) microscopy. Using time-resolved imaging we captured the rapid morphological transition from a spherical haploid to an elongated motile amoeboid cell. Cell tracking revealed slower and more directional swimming compared to haploid cells. Amoeboid metamorphosis was triggered by exposure to bacteria, including strains isolated from G. huxleyi blooms and known G. huxleyi pathogens, but not by a range of classical phytoplankton stressors, including viral infection and oxidative stress. Further, the sub-population of haploids which switched to the amoeboid phase persisted past the rapid crash of the haploid population. This amoeboid phase was only observed in the primary bloom-forming coccolithophore species G. huxleyi and Geopharycapsa oceanica in stationary phase when exposed to high bacterial concentrations, typical of late-stage algal bloom events. Photophysiology of amoeboid cells was confirmed to be unaltered via PAM microscopy, indicating these cells are metabolically active. These findings highlight a previously uncharacterized morphotype in this important phytoplankton species and suggest that the amoeboid phase could be a bacteria-resistant morphotype following algal bloom collapse.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 14th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Life Cycle and Morphogenetic Differentiation in Heteromorphic Cell Types of a Cosmopolitan Marine Microalga
Laurie Bousquet, Shai Fainsod, … Miguel José Frada·New PhytologistPeer-reviewed·Dec 25, 2024
- Exploring the phycosphere of Emiliania huxleyi: from bloom dynamics to microbiome assembly experiments
M. Camara dos Reis, S. Romac, … C. Jeanthon·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2022
- GUARDIANS OF THE CELL: COCCOSPHERE PREVENTS OPPORTUNISTIC BACTERIA ATTACK IN HEAVY CALCIFYING COCCOLITHOPHORE
Sophie T Zweifel, Richard J. Henshaw, … Roman Stocker·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2025
- Distinct physiological responses of Coccolithus braarudii life cycle phases to light intensity and nutrient availability
G. Langer, V. W. Jie, … G. L. Wheeler·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2022
- Viral infection arrests coccolithophore calcification and nutrient consumption, and triggers shifts in organic stoichiometry
T. Dikstein, G. Antler, … M. Frada·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2023
- Taxonomic difference in marine bloom-forming phytoplanktonic species affects dynamics of both bloom-responding prokaryotes and prokaryotic viruses
H. Takebe, K. Tominaga, … T. Yoshida·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2023