The evolution of a placenta is not linked to increased brain size in poeciliid fishes

Maternal investment is considered to have a direct influence on the size of energetically costly organs, including the brain. In placental organisms, offspring are supplied with nutrients during pre-natal development, potentially modulating brain size. However, the coevolution of the placenta and brain size remains largely unknown in non-mammalian taxa. Here, using eight poeciliid fish species, we test if species with placental structures invest more resources into offspring brain development than species without placental structures. We predict that matrotrophy may entail higher nutrient provisioning rates to the developing embryo than lecithotrophy, resulting in larger brain sizes in offspring of matrotrophic species, and that a relatively larger part of the total brain growth would occur at younger ages (leading to a shallower ontogenetic brain size allometry). We took non-invasive brain size measurements during the first four weeks of life, and compared these to somatic growth measurements. Contrary to our expectations, we did not find any differences in brain size between the two maternal strategies. Furthermore, we did not find any differences in how relative brain size changed over ontogenetic development, between placental and non-placental species. In contrast to the marsupial/placental transition, the species investigated here only exhibit pre-natal provisioning, which may reduce the potential for maternal investment into brain size. Consequently, our results suggest that coevolution between placental structures and juvenile brain size is not a general pattern.