bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
scite: a smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning
J. M. Nicholson, M. Mordaunt, P. Lopez, A. Uppala, D. Rosati, N. P. Rodrigues, P. Grabitz, S. Rife
Abstract
Citation indices are tools used by the academic community for research and research evaluation which aggregate scientific literature output and measure scientific impact by collating citation counts. Citation indices help measure the interconnections between scientific papers but fall short because they only display paper titles, authors, and the date of publications, and fail to communicate contextual information about why a citation was made. The usage of citations in research evaluation without due consideration to context can be problematic, if only because a citation that disputes a paper is treated the same as a citation that supports it. To solve this problem, we have used machine learning and other techniques to develop a "smart citation index" called scite, which categorizes citations based on context. Scite shows how a citation was used by displaying the surrounding textual context from the citing paper, and a classification from our deep learning model that indicates whether the statement provides supporting or disputing evidence for a referenced work, or simply mentions it. Scite has been developed by analyzing over 23 million full-text scientific articles and currently has a database of more than 800 million classified citation statements. Here we describe how scite works and how it can be used to further research and research evaluation.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- fCite: a fractional citation tool to quantify an individual's scientific research output
L. P. Kozlowski·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2019
- SciRide Finder : citation-based paradigm in biomedical literature search.
Adam Volanakis, Konrad Krawczyk·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2018
- Measuring the quality of scientific references in Wikipedia: an analysis of more than 115M citations to over 800,000 scientific articles
J. M. Nicholson, A. Uppala, … S. Rife·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2020
- Scholar Metrics Scraper (SMS): automated retrieval of citation and author data
N. A. Cheung, D. Giustini, … T. H. Murphy·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2021
- A formula to estimate a researcher’s impact by prioritizing highly cited publications
Aleksey V. Belikov, Vitaly V. Belikov·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2016
- Tracking self-citations in academic publishing
A. Kacem, J. W. Flatt, P. Mayr·ScientometricsPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2020