Sign in

Measuring the quality of scientific references in Wikipedia: an analysis of more than 115M citations to over 800,000 scientific articles

J. M. Nicholson, A. Uppala, M. Sieber, P. Grabitz, M. Mordaunt, S. Rife

Abstract

Wikipedia is a widely used online reference work which cites hundreds of thousands of scientific articles across its entries. The quality of these citations has not been previously measured, and such measurements have a bearing on the reliability and quality of the scientific portions of this reference work. Using a novel technique, a massive database of qualitatively described citations, and machine learning algorithms, we analyzed 1,923,575 Wikipedia articles which cited a total of 841,821 scientific articles, and found that most cited articles (58%) are uncited or untested by subsequent studies, while the remainder show a wide variability in contradicting or supporting evidence (2-40%).View Full Text

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMaggio '17Pavlovic '20Mammola '20Benjakob '21Colavizza '20Paulus '17
69% semantic matchScientific Communication & Education
L. A. Maggio, J. Willinsky, R. Steinberg+3 more·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2017