bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
MELD: Mutation Effect Learning through Differential embeddings
Aliaa AlajjiiD, Raihan JashiliD, Raghvendra MalliD, Mohamed ElshrifiD
Abstract
We introduce MELD (Mutation Effect Learning through Differential Embeddings), a compact model for predicting the functional consequences of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) by training directly on the wild-type (WT) versus mutant differential. Interpreting SNVs is central to clinical genomics, yet experimental characterization cannot scale to millions of observed variants. Leading sequence-to-function models (Enformer, Borzoi, AlphaGenome) are trained on absolute genomic tracks and score variants post hoc through in-silico mutagenesis (ISM), so the WT-mutant difference never enters the training loss. MELD instead places the logit difference {Delta}z = zmut - zwt inside the supervised objective. It combines a shared CNN-Transformer encoder, a mutant-specific mutation-mask boost, multiscale mutation-centered pooling, and a learned adaptive amplification factor . On ClinVar (1.57M variants), MELD (1.9M parameters) reached an AUROC of 0.986 versus 0.800 for a same-data, same-backbone ISM baseline, with ablations confirming the contribution of each component. On a shared benchmark, it outperformed frozen foundation models with 3-1,300x more parameters (AUROC 0.967 vs. 0.924 for AlphaGenome and 0.936 for Nucleotide Transformer). With only 50, 000 training variants, it exceeded the ISM baseline trained on all 1.48M (AUROC 0.903 vs. 0.796) variants. On BRCA1 saturation genome editing, frozen MELD achieved a Spearman {rho} of 0.42, above Borzoi (0.40), and ClinVar transfer raised it to 0.45. These results demonstrate that direct differential supervision is a compact, data-efficient alternative to post-hoc ISM scoring with substantially larger pretrained models.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: deep learning
- approach: transformer / foundation model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genome-wide prediction of disease variants with a deep protein language model
Nadav Brandes, Grant Goldman, … Vasilis Ntranos·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2022
- AlphaGenome informed machine learning for pathogenicity prediction of germline mutations
Pankaj Kumar, Srishti Singh, … K K Kanaka·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2026
- SNPred outperforms other ensemble-based SNV pathogenicity predictors and elucidates the challenges of using ClinVar for evaluation of variant classification quality.
Иван Игоревич Молотков, Daniel C. Koboldt, Mykyta Artomov·medRxiv·Sep 7, 2023
- pLM-SAV: A Δ-Embedding Approach for Predicting Pathogenic Single Amino Acid Variants
Orsolya Gereben, Hedvig Tordai, … Tamás Hegedűs·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Scalable saturation mutagenesis reveals gene regulatory architecture and rare variant effects
Han Yuan, Xingfan Huang, … David R. Kelley·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2026
- Mendel, a foundation model of human genetic variation, prioritizes regulatory variants and improves gene expression prediction
Chong Wu, Arham Salman, … Wei Pan·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2026