Sign in
BioinformaticsbioRxiv
Preprint

Overcoming Observation Bias for Cancer Progression Modeling

Rudolf SchilliD, Maren KleveriD, Andreas LöschiD, Y. Linda HuiD, Stefan VochtiD, Kevin RuppiD, Lars GrasedyckiD, Rainer SpangiD, Niko BeerenwinkeliD

Abstract

Cancers evolve by accumulating genetic alterations, such as mutations and copy number changes. The chronological order of these events is important for understanding the disease, but not directly observable from cross-sectional genomic data. Cancer progression models (CPMs), such as Mutual Hazard Networks (MHNs), reconstruct the progression dynamics of tumors by learning a network of causal interactions between genetic events from their co-occurrence patterns. However, current CPMs fail to include effects of genetic events on the observation of the tumor itself and assume that observation occurs independently of all genetic events. Since a dataset contains by definition only tumors at their moment of observation, neglecting any causal effects on this event leads to the "conditioning on a collider" bias: Events that make the tumor more likely to be observed appear anti-correlated, which results in spurious suppressive effects or masks promoting effects among genetic events. Here, we extend MHNs by modeling effects from genetic progression events on the observation event, thereby correcting for the collider bias. We derive an efficient tensor formula for the likelihood function and learn two models on somatic mutation datasets from the MSK-IMPACT study. In colon adenocarcinoma, we find a strong effect on observation by mutations in TP53, and in lung adenocarcinoma by mutations in EGFR. Compared to classical MHNs, this explains away many spurious suppressive interactions and uncovers several promoting effects. The data, code, and results are available at https://github.com/cbg-ethz/ObservationMHN.

PDFDOICode

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSchill '19Rupp '24Diaz-Uriart '15Neyshabouri '22Díaz‐Colung '21Chen '22
72% semantic matchBioinformatics
Rudolf Schill, Stefan Solbrig, Tilo Wettig B+1 more·Bioinformatics·Jun 25, 2019· 43 citations