An explainable machine learning consensus framework for robust estimations of environmental effects on population dynamics

Explainable machine learning (ML) methods are gaining increasing attention in environmental and ecological research for their ability to reveal relationships between environmental drivers and population dynamics. However, there remain questions on the reliability of these tools, especially given recent research shows that these explanations can be highly sensitive to model architecture. In ecology, it is typical to use a single ML model, and a comparative evaluation of sensitivity of explainability for different ML approaches is overlooked. In this paper, we develop a novel framework that quantifies explanation consistency between multiple ML model architectures. This framework provides a discrepancy measure for each model prediction, with high discrepancy indicating substantive explanation disagreement across models and low discrepancy indicating strong consensus in explanations across models. We then demonstrate that low explanation discrepancy aligns well with ground truth mechanism. Furthermore, high explanation discrepancy provide a mechanism to identify areas for model refinement and further investigation by domain experts. We do this by using a simulation study based on synthetic coral cover data that incorporate spatio-temporal variability driven by known disturbance effects. Our method provides a quantitative approach to assess the sensitivity of explainable ML in the absence of ground truth. As a result, this enhances the utility of ML approaches in conservation and ecological management. While we focus primarily on ecological modelling for coral reefs, our methods are generally applicable to other ecological and environmental modelling settings.