Seeing Just Enough: The Contribution of Hands, Objects and Visual Features to Egocentric Action Recognition
Filip RybanskyiD, Sadegh Rahmaniboldaji, Andrew GilbertiD, Frank GuériniD, Anya C. HurlbertiD, Quoc C. VuongiD
Abstract
Humans recognize everyday actions without conscious effort despite challenges such as poor viewing conditions and visual similarity between actions. Yet the visual features contributing to action recognition remain unclear. To address this, we combined semantic modelling and feature reduction methods to identify critical features for recognizing actions from challenging egocentric perspectives. We first identified egocentric action videos from home environments that a motion-focused action classification network could correctly classify (Easy videos) or not (Hard videos). In Experiment 1, participants (N=136) labelled the action and object in the videos. Using a language model framework, we derived human ground truth labels for each video and quantified its recognition consistency based on semantic similarity. Participants recognized actions and objects in Easy videos more consistently than in Hard videos. In Experiment 2, we recursively reduced the Easy and Hard videos with high recognition consistency to extract minimal recognizable configurations (MIRCs), in which any further spatial or temporal reductions disrupted recognition. The data was collected using a large-scale online study (N=4360). We extracted information related to the hand, objects, scene background and visual features (e.g., orientation or motion signals) from the 474 MIRCs. Binary classification showed that recognition was disrupted when regions containing the manipulated object and strong orientation signals were removed, while temporal reduction by frame-scrambling disrupted recognition in 73% of MIRCs. The active hand had some marginal contribution. Our results highlight the importance of both mid- and high-level information for egocentric action recognition and link hierarchical feature theories with naturalistic human perception.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Action features dominate cortical representation during natural vision
Heejung Jung, Xiaochun Han, … Samuel A. Nastase·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2025
- Disentangling the Independent Contributions of Visual and Conceptual Features to the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Scene Categorization
Michelle R. Greene, Bruce C. Hansen·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 28, 2020
- Social-affective features drive human representations of observed actions
Diana C. Dima, Tyler M. Tomita, … Leyla Işık·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 24, 2022
- A data-driven investigation of human action representations
Diana C. Dima, Martin N. Hebart, Leyla Işık·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2022
- Shared representations of human actions across vision and language
Diana C. Dima, Sugitha Janarthanan, … Yalda Mohsenzadeh·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2024
- Computation on demand: Action-specific representations of visual task features arise during distinct movement phases
Nina Lee, Lin Lawrence Guo, … Matthias Niemeier·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 24, 2024