Detailed measurements and simulations of electric field distribution of two TMS coils cleared for obsessive compulsive disorder in the brain and in specific regions associated with OCD
Marietta TziriniiD, Yiftach RothiD, Tal Harmelech, Samuel ZibmaniD, Gaby S. Pell, Vasilios Κ. KimiskidisiD, Aron TendleriD, Abraham ZangeniD, Theodoros SamarasiD
Abstract
The FDA cleared deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (Deep TMS) with the H7 coil for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) treatment, following a double-blinded placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Two years later the FDA cleared TMS with the D-B80 coil on the basis of substantial equivalence. In order to investigate the induced electric field characteristics of the two coils, these were placed at the treatment position for OCD over the prefrontal cortex of a head phantom, and the field distribution was measured. Additionally, numerical simulations were performed in eight Population Head Model repository models with two sets of conductivity values and three Virtual Population anatomical head models and their homogeneous versions. The H7 was found to induce significantly higher maximal electric fields (p<0.0001, t=11.08) and to stimulate two to five times larger volumes in the brain (p<0.0001, t=6.71). The rate of decay of electric field with distance is significantly slower for the H7 coil (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs test). The field at the scalp is 306% of the field at a 3 cm depth with the D-B80, and 155% with the H7 coil. The H7 induces significantly higher intensities in broader volumes within the brain and in specific brain regions known to be implicated in OCD (dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA)) compared to the D-B80. Significant field [≥] 80 V/m is induced by the H7 (D-B80) in 15% (1%) of the dACC, 78% (29%) of the pre-SMA, 50% (20%) of the dlPFC, 30% (12%) of the OFC and 15% (1%) of the IFG. Considering the substantial differences between the two coils, the clinical efficacy in OCD should be tested and verified separately for each coil.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Field percentile
- top 16%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Group-Level Analysis of Induced Electric Field in Deep Brain Regions by Different TMS Coils
J. Gomez-Tames, A. Hamasaka, … S. Ueno·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2019
- Practical TMS coils with maximum focality and various stimulation depths
Luis J. Gomez, Lari M. Koponen, … Angel V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2025
- Design of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coils with Optimal Trade-off between Depth, Focality, and Energy
L. Gomez, S. Goetz, A. V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2018
- Augmenting Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil with Magnetic Material: An Optimization Approach
C. Lu, Z.-D. Deng, F.-S. Choa·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2022
- Personalized electric field simulations of deformable large TMS coils based on automatic position and shape optimization
Torge Worbs, Bianka Rumi, … Axel Thielscher·bioRxiv·Dec 27, 2024
- Fast computational optimization of TMS coil placement for individualized electric field targeting
L. Gomez, M. Dannhauer, A. V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·May 27, 2020