Genome biologyGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A standardized framework for representation of ancestry data in genomics studies, with application to the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog
Joannella MoralesiD, Danielle WelteriD, Emily Bowler-BarnettiD, María CerezoiD, Laura Wiseman HarrisiD, Aoife McMahoniD, Peggy Hall, Heather Junkins, Annalisa MilanoiD, Emma HastingsiD, Cinzia Malangone, Annalisa BunielloiD, Tony BurdettiD, Paul FlicekiD, Helen ParkinsoniD, Fiona M CunninghamiD, Lucia A. HindorffiD, Jacqueline A. L. MacArthuriD
- Citations
- 217
- FWCI
- 14.11
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Abstract
BackgroundThe accurate description of ancestry is essential to interpret and integrate human genomics data, and to ensure that advances in the field of genomics benefit individuals from all ancestral backgrounds. However, there are no established guidelines for the consistent, unambiguous and standardized description of ancestry. To fill this gap, we provide a framework, designed for the representation of ancestry in GWAS data, but with wider application to studies and resources involving human subjects.\n\nResultHere we describe our framework and its application to the representation of ancestry data in a widely-used publically available genomics resource, the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog. We present the first analyses of GWAS data using our ancestry categories, demonstrating the validity of the framework to facilitate the tracking of ancestry in big data sets. We exhibit the broader relevance and integration potential of our method by its usage to describe the well-established HapMap and 1000 Genomes reference populations. Finally, to encourage adoption, we outline recommendations for authors to implement when describing samples.\n\nConclusionsWhile the known bias towards inclusion of European ancestry individuals in GWA studies persists, African and Hispanic or Latin American ancestry populations contribute a disproportionately high number of associations, suggesting that analyses including these groups may be more effective at identifying new associations. We believe the widespread adoption of our framework will increase standardization of ancestry data, thus enabling improved analysis, interpretation and integration of human genomics data and furthering our understanding of disease.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: fine-mapping
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: standards for reusability, sustainability and diversity
María Cerezo, Elliot Sollis, … Laura Wiseman Harris·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2024
- GAUSS: A comprehensive R package for accurate estimation of linkage disequilibrium for variants, Gaussian imputation and TWAS analysis of cosmopolitan cohorts
Donghyung Lee, Silviu‐Alin Bacanu·medRxiv·Sep 19, 2023
- Enrichment analyses identify shared associations for 25 quantitative traits in over 600,000 individuals from seven diverse ancestries
Samuel Pattillo Smith, Sahar Shahamatdar, … Sohini Ramachandran·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2022
- From individuals to ancestries: towards attributing trait variation to haplotypes
Yaoling Yang, Daniel John Lawson·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2025
- Multi-trait GWAS for diverse ancestries: Mapping the knowledge gap
Lucie Troubat, Deniz Fettahoglu, … Hanna Julienne·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2024
- Large language model-based bibliometric evaluation of population descriptors in human genetics
Stephanie M. Gogarten, Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko, … Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2026