Comparing and Validating Automated Tools for Individualized Electric Field Simulations in the Human Head

Abstract

Comparing electric field simulations from individualized head models against in-vivo recordings is important for direct validation of computational field modeling for transcranial brain stimulation and brain mapping techniques such as electro- and magnetoencephalography. This also helps to improve simulation accuracy by pinning down the factors having the largest influence on the simulations. Here we compare field simulations from four different automated pipelines, against intracranial voltage recordings in an existing dataset of 14 epilepsy patients. We show that ignoring uncertainty in the simulations leads to a strong bias in the estimated linear relationship between simulated and measured fields. In addition, even though the simulations between the pipelines differ notably, this is not reflected in the correlation with the measurements. We discuss potential reasons for this apparent mismatch and propose a new Bayesian regression analysis of the data that yields unbiased estimates enabling robust conclusions to be reached.