bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Accurate Hippocampal Electric Field Modeling for Electroconvulsive Therapy: Numerical Accuracy and Convergence
Gregory M. NoetscheriD, Derek A. DrummiD, Esra NeufeldiD, Antonino Mario CassaraiD, Bryn LloydiD, Chris AbbottiD, Sergey N MakaroffiD, Zhi‐De DengiD
Abstract
Accurate hippocampal electric field (E-field) prediction is important for individualized electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) dosing and emerging deep-brain stimulation approaches such as temporal interference. Because hippocampal fields are far weaker than those beneath the stimulation electrodes, they are highly sensitive to tissue interfaces, conductivity contrasts, and numerical discretization, so numerical error can rival the physical uncertainties of anatomy and conductivity. We investigate this numerical component of hippocampal dosimetry using individualized head models from eleven ECT patients. Identical head40 segmentations, comprising 40 tissue compartments including the bilateral hippocampi, were simulated with three independent numerical methods: a charge-based boundary-element fast multipole method (BEM-FMM), a voxel-based hexahedral finite-element solver, and a conformal tetrahedral finite-element solver. For each, resolution was increased systematically and convergence assessed from the average hippocampal E-field magnitude. At the highest attainable resolutions, the three methods agreed closely, differing by 6%-7% in the left hippocampus and 9%-12% in the right. At default or coarse resolutions, however, they disagreed by 28.8% on average and up to 50.3% in the right hippocampus. Numerical convergence should therefore be established before differences are attributed to anatomical or conductivity uncertainty, and independent-solver agreement provides a practical basis for reliable hippocampal dosimetry.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparing and Validating Automated Tools for Individualized Electric Field Simulations in the Human Head
O. Puonti, G. Bicalho Saturnino, … A. Thielscher·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2019
- Biophysical modeling of the electric field magnitude and distribution induced by electrical stimulation with intracerebral electrodes
Fabiola Alonso, Borja Mercadal, … Julien Modolo·Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressPeer-reviewed·May 10, 2023
- Model-based assessment of race, sex, and electrode montage in ECT
Niranjan Khadka, Yu Huang, … Abhishek Datta·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2026
- Adaptive current-flow models of ECT: Explaining individual static impedance, dynamic impedance, and brain current delivery
G. Unal, J. K. Swami, … M. Bikson·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2020
- Evaluating the Influence of Anatomical Accuracy and Electrode Positions on EEG Forward Solutions
Jesper Duemose Nielsen, Oula Puonti, … Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2023
- Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem
Sven Wagner, Felix Lucka, … Carsten H. Wolters·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2016