bioRxivEcology
An 18S V4 rDNA metabarcoding dataset of protist diversity in the Atlantic inflow to the Arctic Ocean, through the year and down to 1000 m depth.
E. Egge, S. Elferink, D. Vaulot, U. John, G. Bratbak, A. Larsen, B. Edvardsen
Abstract
Arctic marine protist communities have been understudied due to challenging sampling conditions, in particular during winter and in deep waters. The aim of this study was to improve our knowledge on Arctic protist diversity through the year, both in the epipelagic (< 200 m depth) and mesopelagic zones (200-1000 m depth). Sampling campaigns were performed in 2014, during five different months, to capture the various phases of the Arctic primary production: January (winter), March (pre-bloom), May (spring bloom), August (post-bloom) and November (early winter). The cruises were undertaken west and north of the Svalbard archipelago, where warmer Atlantic waters from the West Spitsbergen Current meets cold Arctic waters from the Arctic Ocean. From each cruise, station, and depth, 50 L of sea water were collected and the plankton was size-fractionated by serial filtration into four size fractions between 0.45-200 {micro}m, representing the picoplankton, nanoplankton and microplankton. In addition vertical net hauls were taken from 50 m depth to the surface at selected stations. From the plankton samples DNA was extracted, the V4 region of the 18S rRNA-gene was amplified by PCR with universal eukaryote primers and the amplicons were sequenced by Illumina high-throughput sequencing. Sequences were clustered into Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs), representing protist genotypes, with the dada2 pipeline. Taxonomic classification was made against the curated Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2). Altogether 6,536 protist ASVs were obtained (including 54 fungal ASVs). Both ASV richness and taxonomic composition were strongly dependent on size-fraction, season, and depth. ASV richness was generally higher in the smaller fractions, and higher in winter and the mesopelagic samples than in samples from the well-lit epipelagic zone during summer. During spring and summer, the phytoplankton groups diatoms, chlorophytes and haptophytes dominated in the epipelagic zone. Parasitic and heterotrophic groups such as Syndiniales and certain dinoflagel-lates dominated in the mesopelagic zone all year, as well as in the epipelagic zone during the winter. The dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.17882/79823, (Egge et al., 2014).
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Planktonic protist diversity across contrasting Subtropical and Subantarctic waters of the southwest Pacific
A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez, A. Lopes dos Santos, … S. D. Nodder·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2021
- The community of Marine Alveolate parasites in the Atlantic inflow to the Arctic Ocean is structured by season, depth and water mass
E. Egge, D. Vaulot, … B. Edvardsen·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2024
- Temporal dynamics and biogeography of sympagic and planktonic autotrophic microbial eukaryotes during the under-ice Arctic bloom
Clarence Wei Hung Sim, Catherine Gérikas Ribeiro, … Adriana Lopes dos Santos·ISME CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Depth-dependent dynamics of protist communities as an integral part of spring succession in a freshwater reservoir
I. Mukherjee, V. Grujcic, … T. Shabarova·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2024
- Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom diversity across the marginal ice zone in Baffin Bay
C. G. Ribeiro, A. L. dos Santos, … D. Vaulot·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2022
- Spatial distribution of Arctic bacterioplankton abundance is linked to distinct water masses and summertime phytoplankton bloom dynamics (Fram Strait, 79°N)
M. G. Cardozo-Mino, E. Fadeev, … A. Boetius·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2020