henhaobio
Sign in

Cognitive Affective & Behavioral NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

The neural basis of cost-benefit trade-offs in effort investment: a quantitative activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis

Nathaniel Edgar, Kevin da Silva CastanheiraiD, Gary R. TurneriD, R. Nathan SprengiD, Eliana VassenaiD, A. Ross OttoiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Influential theories of cognitive effort-based decision-making suggest that a cost-benefit trade-off guides mental effort allocation and that this trade-off may be reflected in shared neural activity in circuits tracking potential reward and task demand, supporting the idea that. While the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) - and particularly the anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) - has been proposed as a candidate region implementing this computation, it remains unclear whether mPFC/dACC activity tracks rewards and task demand independently or integrates them to reflect effort intensity. Recent accounts posit that the dACC plays a key role in mediating cost-benefit trade-offs. However, empirical evidence remains inconsistent. We conducted a systematic meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies, using the activation-likelihood estimation method to quantify brain activity across 45 studies (N = 1273 participants) investigating choices and task performance in reward-guided cognitive control. We observed significant recruitment of the mPFC/dACC, putamen, and anterior insula for processing larger rewards and higher task demands. The mPFC/dACC clusters sensitive to task demands and rewards were anatomically distinct: caudal mPFC/dACC activity tracked increasing task demands, while rostral mPFC/dACC activity tracked increasing reward. Interestingly, caudal mPFC/dACC activity tracked the integration of reward and task-demand, compatible with cost-benefit trade-off theories of dACC function. These findings provide evidence for distinct signals for mental demand and reward in the mPFC/dACC, which are integrated to support the decision to invest mental effort.

Citations
7
FWCI
5.98
Field percentile
top 4%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISClairis '22Klein-Flugg '16Hogan '17Yee '21Yee '25Hassall '22
81% semantic matchNeuroscience
Nicolas Clairis, Mathias Pessiglione·Journal of Neuroscience·Jun 2, 2022· 28 citations