Briefings in BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms on the microbial strain-specific AMP prediction
Boris VishnepolskyiD, Maya Grigolava, Grigol Managadze, Andrei E. GabrielianiD, Alex RosenthaliD, Darrell E. HurtiD, Michael TartakovskyiD, Malak Pirtskhalava
Abstract
The evolution of drug-resistant pathogenic microbial species is a major global health concern. Naturally occurring, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are considered promising candidates to address antibiotic resistance problems. A variety of computational methods have been developed to accurately predict AMPs. The majority of such methods are not microbial strain-specific (MSS): they can predict whether a given peptide is active against some microbe, but cannot accurately calculate whether such peptide would be active against a particular microbial strain. Due to insufficient data on most microbial strains, only a few MSS predictive models have been developed so far. To overcome this problem, we developed a novel approach that allows to improve MSS predictive models (MSSPM), based on properties, computed for AMP sequences and characteristics of genomes, computed for target microbial strains. New models can perform predictions of AMPs for microbial strains that do not have data on peptides tested on them. We tested various types of feature engineering as well as different machine learning (ML) algorithms to compare the predictive abilities of resulting models. Among the ML algorithms, Random Forest and AdaBoost performed best. By using genome characteristics as additional features, the performance for all models increased significantly--on average by 7%--relative to models relying on AMP sequence-based properties only. Our novel MSS AMP predictor is freely accessible as part of DBAASP database resource at https://dbaasp.org/tools?page=genome-prediction
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 46
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- SAMP: Identifying Antimicrobial Peptides by an Ensemble Learning Model Based on Proportionalized Split Amino Acid Composition
Junxi Feng, Mengtao Sun, … Shibiao Wan·Briefings in Functional GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2024
- BATTLE-AMP: Benchmarking Antimicrobial Peptide Predictors
Paulina Szymczak, Adriana Bukala, … Ewa Szczurek·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2026
- Benchmarks in antimicrobial peptide prediction are biased due to the selection of negative data
Katarzyna Sidorczuk, Przemysław Gagat, … Michał Jan Burdukiewicz·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 21, 2022
- Antimicrobial peptide databases and prediction tools: Toward a standard evaluation framework
Alejandro Cisterna‐García, Alvaro Maximo Gonzalez Lopez, … Juan Antonio Botía·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2026
- The antimicrobial peptides pipeline: a bacteria-centric AMP predictor
Werner Pieter Veldsman, Zou Yuanjie, … Lu Zhang·Current Gene TherapyPeer-reviewed·Feb 27, 2025
- Species- and Topic-aware Representation Learning for Antimicrobial Peptide Discovery
Sarala Padi, Kinjal Mondal, … Walid Keyrouz·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2026