Parent/caregiver needs during pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a scoping literature review
Abstract
PurposeThe integration of genome-wide sequencing (GWS), including whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing, has transformed pediatric diagnostics, yet the needs of parents and caregivers during this process remain insufficiently explored. This scoping review aims to synthesize current knowledge on parental and caregiver needs across the GWS process in pediatric settings to inform better clinical practices and support systems. MethodsA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were searched, yielding 574 studies, with 47 meeting the inclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, clinical settings, and identified parental needs categorized into pre-test, interim, and post-test periods. Conventional content analysis was used to inductively code and identify themes. ResultsParental needs were categorized into two main themes: (1) Informational needs, encompassing tailored communication, understanding prognosis, logistics, and evolving information, and (2) Emotional support, emphasizing the importance of initial provider interactions and support from healthcare providers and peer groups. Informational and emotional needs were interrelated, impacting parents overall experiences. The review highlighted significant gaps during the interim waiting period, with needs largely focused on pre- and post-test periods. ConclusionParents navigating the pediatric GWS process require comprehensive informational and emotional support. Effective communication before testing and empathetic follow-up contribute to positive experiences. Addressing gaps at different time throughout the process and fostering continuous provider and peer support can enhance the integration of GWS in pediatric care, improving family-centered outcomes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Fathers' and Mothers' Support Needs and Support Experiences After Rapid Genome Sequencing
Helen Dolling, Sophie Rowitch, … Kate Baker·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2025
- When to return genomic newborn screening results: health care professional perspectives
Anna C. F. Lewis, Adam H. Buchanan, … Ingrid A. Holm·medRxiv·Sep 7, 2026
- Diverse Participant Recruitment for Infant Sequencing in the BabySeq Project
Maya C. del Rosario, Sheyenne A. Walmsley, … Stacey Pereira·medRxiv·Oct 1, 2024
- Implementing a consultation service for translating genomic research findings into the clinic: lessons from the SickKids Genome Board
Amy Y. Pan, Kenzie Pulsifer, … Gregory Costain·Paediatrics & Child HealthPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025
- Information and genetic counselling for psychiatric risks in children with rare genomic disorders
Andrew Cuthbert, Aimée Challenger, … Marianne B. M. van den Bree·medRxiv·Sep 25, 2019
- Sequencing for a Lifetime: Professional Perspectives on the Value and Feasibility of Lifelong Genomic Medicine
Anna C F Lewis, Ingrid A. Holm, … Robert C. Green·medRxiv·Oct 3, 2026