henhaobio
Sign in

BioinformaticsSystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Optimizing data integration improves Gene Regulatory Network inference in Arabidopsis thaliana

Océane CassaniD, Charles‐Henri LecellieriD, Antoine MartiniD, Laurent BréhéliniD, Sophie LèbreiD

PDFDOIPreprintCode

Abstract

MotivationsGene Regulatory Networks (GRN) are traditionnally inferred from gene expression profiles monitoring a specific condition or treatment. In the last decade, integrative strategies have successfully emerged to guide GRN inference from gene expression with complementary prior data. However, datasets used as prior information and validation gold standards are often related and limited to a subset of genes. This lack of complete and independent evaluation calls for new criteria to robustly estimate the optimal intensity of prior data integration in the inference process. ResultsWe address this issue for two common regression-based GRN inference models, an integrative Random Forest (weigthedRF) and a generalized linear model with stability selection estimated under a weighted LASSO penalty (weightedLASSO). These approaches are applied to data from the root response to nitrate induction in Arabidopsis thaliana. For each gene, we measure how the integration of transcription factor binding motifs influences model prediction. We propose a new approach, DIOgene, that uses model prediction error and a simulated null hypothesis for optimizing data integration strength in a hypothesis-driven, gene-specific manner. The resulting integration scheme reveals a strong diversity of optimal integration intensities between genes. In addition, it provides a good trade-off between prediction error minimization and validation on experimental interactions, while master regulators of nitrate induction can be accurately retrieved. Availability and implementationThe R code and notebooks demonstrating the use of the proposed approaches are available in the repository https://github.com/OceaneCsn/integrative_GRN_N_induction.

Citations
4
FWCI
0.54
Field percentile
top 42%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISClercq '20Nair '17Wang '20Liang '19Gómez-Cano '24Khojasteh '21
67% semantic matchPlant Biology
I. De Clercq, J. Van de Velde, X. Luo+7 more·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2020