NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Methods for evaluating unsupervised vector representations of genomic regions
Guangtao ZhengiD, Julia RymuzaiD, Erfaneh GharaviiD, Nathan J. LeRoyiD, Aidong ZhangiD, Nathan C. SheffieldiD
Abstract
Representation learning models have become a mainstay of modern genomics. These models are trained to yield vector representations, or embeddings, of various biological entities, such as cells, genes, individuals, or genomic regions. Recent applications of unsupervised embedding approaches have been shown to learn relationships among genomic regions that define functional elements in a genome. Unsupervised representation learning of genomic regions is free of the supervision from curated metadata and can condense rich biological knowledge from publicly available data to region embeddings. However, there exists no method for evaluating the quality of these embeddings in the absence of metadata, making it difficult to assess the reliability of analyses based on the embeddings, and to tune model training to yield optimal results. To bridge this gap, we propose four evaluation metrics: the cluster tendency score (CTS), the reconstruction score (RCS), the genome distance scaling score (GDSS), and the neighborhood preserving score (NPS). The CTS and RCS statistically quantify how well region embeddings can be clustered and how well the embeddings preserve information in training data. The GDSS and NPS exploit the biological tendency of regions close in genomic space to have similar biological functions; they measure how much such information is captured by individual region embeddings in a set. We demonstrate the utility of these statistical and biological scores for evaluating unsupervised genomic region embeddings and provide guidelines for learning reliable embeddings. AvailabilityCode is available at https://github.com/databio/geniml
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Field percentile
- top 25%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Embeddings of genomic region sets capture rich biological associations in lower dimensions
Erfaneh Gharavi, Aaron Gu, … Nathan C. Sheffield·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2021
- Benchmarking gene embeddings from sequence, expression, network, and text models for functional prediction tasks
Jeffrey Zhong, Lechuan Li, … Vicky Yao·bioRxiv·Jan 29, 2025
- Joint representation learning for retrieval and annotation of genomic interval sets
Erfaneh Gharavi, Nathan J. LeRoy, … Nathan C. Sheffield·BioengineeringPeer-reviewed·Mar 8, 2024
- The Latentverse: An Open-Source Benchmarking Toolkit for Evaluating Latent Representations
Yoanna Turura, Sam Freesun Friedman, … Sana Tonekaboni·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2025
- Gene2Vec: Distributed Representation of Genes Based on Co-Expression
Jingcheng Du, Peilin Jia, … Degui Zhi·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2019
- From nucleotides to semantics: genomic representation learning via joint-embedding predictive architecture
Chengsen Wang, Qi Qi, … Jingyu Wang·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2026