bioRxivNeuroscience
Sensitivity to visual features in inattentional blindness
Makaela S. NartkeriD, Chaz FirestoneiD, Howard E. EgethiD, Ian B. PhillipsiD
Abstract
The relation between attention, perception and awareness is among the most fundamental problems in the science of the mind. One of the most striking and well-known phenomena bearing on this question is inattentional blindness (IB; Neisser & Becklen, 1975; Mack & Rock, 1998; Most et al., 2001, 2005). In IB, naive observers fail to report clearly visible stimuli when their attention is otherwise engaged--famously even missing a gorilla parading before their eyes (Simons & Chabris, 1999). This phenomenon and the research programs it has motivated carry tremendous theoretical significance, both as crucial evidence that awareness requires attention (Cohen et al., 2012; Prinz, 2012; Noah & Mangun, 2020) and as a key tool in seeking the neural correlates of consciousness (Rees et al., 1999; Pitts et al., 2014; Hutchinson, 2019). However, these and other implications critically rest on a notoriously biased measure: asking participants whether they noticed anything unusual (and interpreting negative answers as reflecting a complete lack of perception). Here, in the largest ever set of IB studies, we show that, as a group, inattentionally blind participants can successfully report the location, color and shape of the stimuli they deny noticing. This residual visual sensitivity shows that perceptual information remains accessible in IB. We further show that subjective reports in IB are conservative, by introducing absent trials where no IB stimulus is presented; this approach allows us to show for the first time that observers collectively show a systematic bias to report not noticing in IB--essentially playing it safe in reporting their sensitivity. This pair of results is consistent with an alternative hypothesis about IB, namely that inattentionally blind subjects retain some degree of awareness of the stimuli they fail to report. Overall, these data provide the strongest evidence to date of significant residual visual sensitivity in IB. They also challenge the use of inattentional blindness to argue that awareness requires attention.
- Citations
- 9
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Graded Visual Consciousness During the Attentional Blink
Anna Eiserbeck, Alexander Enge, … Rasha Abdel Rahman·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2021
- No Electrophysiological Evidence for Semantic Processing During Inattentional Blindness
Brendan T. Hutchinson, Bradley N. Jack, … Michael A. Pitts·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2024
- Perceptual versus attentional impairments of conscious access: Distinct neural mechanisms despite equal task performance
Samuel Noorman, Timo Stein, … Simon van Gaal·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- Relative Blindsight Induced by Incongruency with Working Memory
Wonyi Che, Hakwan C. Lau, Tomoya Nakamura·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2025
- When awareness outstrips performance: critical tests of subjective inflation under inattention
Karen J. Tian, Brian Maniscalco, … Rachel N. Denison·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2025
- Two faces of perceptual awareness during the attentional blink: Gradual and discrete
Aytaç Karabay, Sophia A. Wilhelm, … Elkan G. Akyürek·Journal of Experimental Psychology GeneralPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2021