bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Distinct EEG microstate signatures across different pain types
Pouya RabieiiD, Alyson Champagne, Lorie-Eve Barrette, Nadim Fakhry, Hugo Massé‐AlarieiD, Michel‐Pierre ColliD
Abstract
Pain is associated with dynamic brain reorganization. Electroencephalographic microstates can characterize transient large-scale brain states, yet findings across pain studies are inconsistent. Two features may contribute: conditions have been studied in isolation, and analytical pipelines vary widely. We applied a harmonized analysis pipeline across three pain conditions: capsaicininduced pain, assessed within participants against a pain-free baseline, and non-chronic and chronic back pain, each compared with matched controls. Using a five-minute resting-state electroencephalographic recordings we examined microstate topography, temporal expression and transition probabilities, and directly compared pain related differences across pain states. We identified five microstates (A-E), corresponding to auditory, visual, salience, and attentional networks. Capsaicin pain showed increased expression of microstate C and reduced expression of microstates A, D and E. Transitions were redistributed towards microstate C, indicating a shift toward salience-related processing at the expense of sensory and attentional dynamics. In clinical back pain, effects were smaller and diverged by pain type: non-chronic back pain showed lower microstate C occurrence, opposite in direction to the capsaicin effect, whereas chronic back pain showed lower microstate D global explained variance, suggesting salience and attentional differences in clinical pain. Direct comparisons showed weaker pain-related increases in microstate C expression in both clinical back pain groups than capsaicin pain, with additional differences involving microstates A, D and E. These findings argue against a unitary EEG microstate signature of pain and instead reveal pain-type-specific patterns of large-scale brain dynamics, with microstate C providing the clearest distinction between experimental and clinical pain.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dynamics of brain function in chronic pain patients assessed by microstate analysis of resting-state electroencephalography
Elisabeth S. May, Cristina Gil Ávila, … Markus Ploner·PainPeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2021
- Whole-brain EEG dynamics depending on the stimulus modality and task requirements in oddball tasks
Shiho Kashihara, Tomohisa Asai, Hiroshi Imamizu·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2025
- EEG Microstate Correlates of Emotion Dynamics and Stimulation Content during Video Watching
Wanrou Hu, Zhiguo Zhang, … Zhen Liang·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2022
- EEG Reveals Robust Within-Person but Unstable Between-Person Neural Encoding of Pain
Laura Tiemann, Felix S. Bott, … Markus Ploner·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2025
- Investigation on How Dynamic Effective Connectivity Patterns Encode the Fluctuating Pain Intensity in Chronic Migraine
Iege Bassez, Frederik Van de Steen, … Enrico Schulz·Neurobiology of PainPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2022
- Brain dysfunction in chronic pain patients assessed by resting-state electroencephalography
Son Ta Dinh, Moritz M. Nickel, … Markus Ploner·PainPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2019