Imaging NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Calibration of MRI-based reference intervals to new samples
Andrew A. CheniD, Jakob SeidlitziD, Margaret GardneriD, Richard A. I. BethlehemiD, Lena DorfschmidtiD, Eren KafadariD, Andreana M. BeniteziD, Jens H. JenseniD, Simon VandekariD, Theodore Daniel SatterthwaiteiD, Aaron F. Alexander‐BlochiD
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
Abstract
Reference intervals, defined as intervals containing a new observation with a specified probability relative to reference data, would be clinically useful in assessing brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Brain charts, which are estimates of MRI phenotypes across covariates such as age and sex, can be used to construct reference intervals. However, the reference data used to fit intervals often differs from a new sample in terms of study design, MRI acquisition, and image preprocessing. Application of MRI reference intervals to new samples remains a challenging problem. Here, we propose a new method called Reference interval calibration via conFormal prediction (ReForm) that adjusts reference intervals for a new sample. Our method builds on recent work in conformal prediction, which yields intervals with guaranteed coverage for new observations. Through resampling experiments in Lifespan Brain Chart Consortium cortical thickness data, we compare ReFormed reference intervals to refitting intervals, statistical harmonization methods, and model-based adjustment of intervals. Notably for patient privacy concerns, ReForm does not require sharing of reference data. Yet, our empirical results demonstrate that ReForm controls FPR similarly or better than alternative methods which require sharing reference data. Finally, we provide recommendations for practical applications of ReForm and an R package (https://github.com/andy1764/ReForm) for calibrating reference intervals using ReForm.
- assay: imaging
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: contrastive learning
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Age Predictions via Conformal Prediction
Ujjwal Samanta, Golia Shafiei, … Andrew Chen·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2026
- Brain charts for the human lifespan
Richard A. I. Bethlehem, Jakob Seidlitz, … Brigitte Landeau·NaturePeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2022
- Beyond Marginal Coverage: Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction in Multi-Class Psychiatric Neuroimaging
Hooman Rokham, Haleh Falakshahi, Vince D. Calhoun·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2026
- BRAIN CAST: An MRIQC-guided pipeline for age- and sex-specific pediatric brain MRI template construction, validated by downstream structural fidelity
Y H Hu, Jose Luis Contreras-Vidal·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2026
- Restoring statistical validity in group analyses of motion-corrupted MRI data
Antoine Lutti, Nadège Corbin, … Giulia Di Domenicantonio·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2022
- Prediction of brain age using structural magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison of accuracy and test-retest reliability of publicly available software packages
Ruben P. Dörfel, Joan M. Arenas‐Gomez, … Pontus Plavén‐Sigray·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2023