Topic · Social Psychology · Psychology
Deception detection and forensic psychology
OpenAlex topic; a paper is listed when OpenAlex scores it at least 0.5 for this topic.
9 papers
Evaluating Physiological Indicators in Detecting Deception and Truthfulness using the Comparison Question Test (CQT)
A M Shahruj Rashid, Bryan Carmichael, Charlize Su, Keming Shi, Keefe Lim, Senthil Kumar Poorvika, Ngok Jeun Wan, Eshaan Govil, Dennis Yap
This study evaluates physiological indicators like pupil response, EDA, HR, and facial temperature to detect deception using CQT in an Asian context, finding pupil response as the strongest predictor.
bioRxiv · Sep 1, 2024 · PreprintBioengineering
Dynamic valuation bias explains social influence on cheating behavior
Julien Bénistant, Valentin Guigon, Alain Nicolas, Edmund A. Derrington, Jean‐Claude Dreher
The paper investigates how observing others' dishonesty influences cheating behavior through dynamic valuation bias and identifies neural mechanisms involved in this process.
bioRxiv · May 21, 2024 · PreprintNeuroscience
Nothing but lies: improving the validity of neural predictors of deception
Sangil Lee, Runxuan Niu, Lusha Zhu, Andrew S. Kayser, Ming Chieh Hsu
The paper improves the validity of neural predictors of deception by identifying and removing confounding signals using novel machine learning methods.
bioRxiv · May 8, 2024 · PreprintNeuroscience
Collaborations and deceptions in strategic interactions revealed by hyperscanning fMRI
Siao-Shan Shen, Jen-Tang Cheng, Yi-Ren Hsu, Der-Yow Chen, Ming-Hung Weng, Chun‐Chia Kung
This study uses hyperscanning fMRI to analyze deception and cooperation in a game, finding brain connectivity patterns linked to lying behavior and social trust.
bioRxiv · Jul 11, 2021 · PreprintNeuroscience
How the Motor Aspect of Speaking Influences the Blink Rate
Mareike Brych, Supriya Murali, Barbara Händel
This study finds that motor activity, specifically lip movements during speaking, significantly increases blink rate, suggesting caution in using blinks as neurological indicators during interviews.
bioRxiv · Jul 31, 2020 · PreprintNeuroscience
Individual differences in (dis)honesty are represented in the brain's functional connectivity:Robust out-of-sample prediction of cheating behavior
Sebastian P. H. Speer, Ale Smidts, Maarten A.S. Boksem
This study predicts cheating behavior using brain connectivity patterns and finds that neural networks related to self-referential thinking and control are key predictors of honesty.
bioRxiv · May 12, 2020 · PreprintNeuroscience
When honest people cheat, and cheaters are honest: Cognitive control processes override our moral default
Sebastian P. H. Speer, Ale Smidts, Maarten A.S. Boksem
The paper investigates how cognitive control influences honesty and dishonesty by examining neural activity in specific brain regions during a cheating task.
bioRxiv · Jan 23, 2020 · PreprintNeuroscience
fMRI Correlates of Reaction Time Prolongation during intentional False Responding; an inter-individual difference study
Morteza Pishnamazi, Maral Yeganeh Doost, Habib Ganjgahi, Hamed Ekhtiari, Mohammad Ali Oghabian
The paper investigates how brain activity correlates with reaction time prolongation during intentional false responding, identifying regions associated with RT cost and baseline speed.
bioRxiv · Nov 26, 2016 · PreprintNeuroscience