Author

N. Riedel

Listed by name: these papers carry no ORCID for this author, so different people with the same name may be mixed together.

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Scientific Communication & Education· 4 Cell Biology· 1

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Research Focus:benchmarking· 4 Approach:statistical model· 3 Approach:benchmark study· 1 Research Focus:cell type annotation· 1 Assay:clinical cohort / trial· 1 Research Focus:clustering· 1 Approach:deep learning· 1 Research Focus:differential expression· 1

Frequent Co-Authors

T. L. Weissgerber· 2 shared V. Kazezian· 2 shared A. Akan· 1 shared A. Koppold· 1 shared B. Ghosh· 1 shared B. Siegerink· 1 shared C. A. Moreira Restrepo· 1 shared C. Kroon· 1 shared

Activity by Year

2019-2022 · peak 2/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

10 top collaborators · 22 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

2 shared papersCell Biology

T. L. Weissgerber

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

5 papers

Recent·Most cited

Blind spots on western blots: a meta-research study highlighting opportunities to improve figures and methods reporting

C. Kroon, L. Breuer, L. Jones, J. An, A. Akan, E. Ahmed Mohamed Ali, F. Busch, M. Fislage, B. Ghosh, M. Hellrigel-Holderbaum, V. Kazezian, A. Koppold, C. A. Moreira Restrepo, N. Riedel, L. Scherschinski, , T. L. Weissgerber

This paper analyzes western blot practices in top neuroscience and cell biology journals, finding widespread issues with image display and methods reporting, and provides tools to improve transparency and reproducibility.

bioRxiv · May 13, 2022Cell Biology

Replacing bar graphs of continuous data with more informative graphics: Are we making progress?

N. Riedel, R. Schulz, V. Kazezian, T. L. Weissgerber

This study assesses changes in scientific visualization practices from 2010 to 2020, finding that bar graphs of continuous data are still commonly misused despite calls for better graphical representation.

bioRxiv · Mar 14, 2022Scientific Communication & Education

Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: how open is open?

S. Serghiou, D. G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, K. W. Boyack, N. Riedel, J. D. Wallach, J. P. A. Ioannidis

This study assesses transparency indicators in biomedical literature by analyzing 2.75 million PubMed Central articles to track improvements in data sharing, code sharing, and disclosures over time.

bioRxiv · Oct 30, 2020Scientific Communication & Education

ODDPub - a Text-Mining Algorithm to Detect Data Sharing in Biomedical Publications

N. Riedel, M. Kip, E. Bobrov

ODDPub detects Open Data and Open Code in biomedical publications using text-mining, achieving 74% sensitivity and 97% specificity for Open Data.

Data Science Journal · Oct 29, 2020Peer-reviewedScientific Communication & Education

Results dissemination from clinical trials conducted at German university medical centres was delayed and incomplete

S. Wieschowski, N. Riedel, K. Wollmann, H. Kahrass, S. Mueller-Ohlraun, C. Schuermann, S. Kelley, U. Kszuk, B. Siegerink, U. Dirnagl, J. Meerpohl, D. Strech

The paper tracks results dissemination from clinical trials at German university medical centers, finding delays and incomplete reporting.

bioRxiv · Jun 11, 2019Scientific Communication & Education