Author

Nathan Tardiff

New York UniversityORCID 0000-0002-0233-8529Unclaimed ORCID profile · follow to get notified of new preprints

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Neuroscience· 4

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Organism:human· 4 Approach:experimental assay· 2 Approach:statistical model· 2 Research Focus:differential expression· 1 Assay:imaging· 1

Frequent Co-Authors

Clayton E. CurtisiD· 2 shared Joshua I. GoldiD· 2 shared Grace E. Hallenbeck· 1 shared Jiwon KangiD· 1 shared Lalitta Suriya-ArunrojiD· 1 shared Thomas C. SpragueiD· 1 shared Xiao-Jing WangiD· 1 shared Xingyu DingiD· 1 shared

Activity by Year

2022-2026 · peak 1/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

9 top collaborators · 10 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

2 shared papersNeuroscience

Clayton E. CurtisORCID

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

4 papers

Recent·Most cited

Visual field map size constrains working memory precision

Nathan Tardiff, Xingyu Ding, Xiao-Jing Wang, Clayton E. Curtis

The paper investigates whether the size of visual field maps in the brain correlates with working memory precision and finds a positive association.

bioRxiv · Jun 4, 2026 · PreprintNeuroscience

Prioritizing working memory resources depends on prefrontal cortex

Grace E. Hallenbeck, Nathan Tardiff, Thomas C. Sprague, Clayton E. Curtis

This study uses transcranial magnetic stimulation to test how prefrontal cortex perturbations affect working memory resource allocation, finding that disrupting control processes improves memory for low-priority items.

Journal of Neuroscience · Jan 27, 2025Peer-reviewedNeuroscience

Normative evidence weighing and accumulation in correlated environments

Nathan Tardiff, Jiwon Kang, Joshua I. Gold

The paper shows humans adaptively weigh and accumulate evidence in correlated observation environments, aligning with normative principles.

bioRxiv · May 29, 2024Neuroscience

Rule-based and stimulus-based cues bias auditory decisions via different computational and physiological mechanisms

Nathan Tardiff, Lalitta Suriya-Arunroj, Yale E. Cohen, Joshua I. Gold

The paper compares how rule-based and stimulus-based cues influence auditory decisions, finding distinct computational and physiological mechanisms for each.

PLoS Computational Biology · Oct 7, 2022Peer-reviewedNeuroscience