Stopping Speed in Response to Auditory and Visual Stop Signals Depends on Go Signal Modality
Simon WeberiD, Sauro E. SalomoniiD, Rebecca J. St GeorgeiD, Mark R. HinderiD
Abstract
Past research has found that the speed of the action cancellation process is influenced by the sensory modality/modalities of the environmental change that triggers it. However, the effect on selective stopping processes (where participants must cancel only one component of a multi-component movement) remains unknown, despite these complex movements often being required as we navigate our busy modern world. Thirty healthy adults (mean age = 31.1 years, SD = 10.5) completed five response-selective stop signal tasks featuring different combinations of "go signal" modality (the environmental change baring an imperative to initiate movement; auditory or visual) and "stop signal" modality (the environmental change indicating that action cancellation is required; auditory, visual, or audiovisual). Electromyographical (EMG) recordings of effector muscles allowed detailed comparison of the characteristics of voluntary action and cancellation between tasks. Behavioural and physiological measures of stopping speed demonstrated that the modality of the go signal influenced how quickly participants cancelled movement in response to the stop signal: stopping was faster in two cross-modal experimental conditions (auditory go - visual stop; visual go - auditory stop), than in two conditions using the same modality for both signals. A separate condition testing for multisensory facilitation revealed that stopping was fastest when the stop signal consisted of a combined audiovisual stimulus, compared to all other go-stop stimulus combinations. These findings provide novel evidence regarding the role of attentional networks in action cancellation and suggest modality specific cognitive resources influence the latency of the stopping process.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Faster action reprogramming, but not stopping, with proactive cues: Combining EMG and computational modelling in response-selective stop signal tasks
Sauro E. Salomoni, Quentin F. Gronau, … Mark R. Hinder·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2023
- When Stopping Requires Going; Physiological Similarities Between Action Cancellation and the Cancellation of Action Cancellation
Simon Weber, Sauro E. Salomoni, Mark R. Hinder·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Dissociating Attentional Capture from Action Cancellation in the Stop Signal Task
Simon Weber, Sauro E. Salomoni, … Mark R. Hinder·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2022
- Stopping and Changing Expected and Unexpected Movements
Simon Weber, Nicholas Vucak, … Mark R. Hinder·Biological PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2026
- Towards a two-stage model of action-stopping: Attentional capture explains motor inhibition during early stop-signal processing
Joshua R. Tatz, Cheol Soh, Jan R. Wessel·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2021
- The Contextual Specificity of Pausing: Interpreting Electromyographic Partial Responses During Action Cancellation and Attentional Capture
Simon Weber, Keegan Haugh, … Mark R. Hinder·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2026